The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow
Abstract
An exact and very general Lagrangian-mean description of the back effect of oscillatory disturbances upon the mean state is given. The basic formalism applies to any problem whose governing equations are given in the usual Eulerian form, and irrespective of whether spatial, temporal, ensemble, or ‘two-timing’ averages are appropriate. The generalized Lagrangian-mean velocity cannot be defined exactly as the ‘mean following a single fluid particle’, but in cases where spatial averages are taken can easily be visualized, for instance, as the motion of the centre of mass of a tube of fluid particles which lay along the direction of averaging in a hypothetical initial state of no disturbance. The equations for the Lagrangian-mean flow are more useful than their Eulerian-mean counterparts in significant respects, for instance in explicitly representing the effect upon mean-flow evolution of wave dissipation or forcing. Applications to irrotational acoustic or water waves, and to astrogeophysical problems of waves on axisymmetric mean flows are discussed. In the latter context the equations embody generalizations of the Eliassen-Palm and Charney-Drazin theorems showing the effects on the mean flow of departures from steady, conservative waves, for arbitrary, finite-amplitude disturbances to a stratified, rotating fluid, with allowance for self-gravitation as well as for an external gravitational field. The equations show generally how the pseudomomentum (or wave ‘momentum’) enters problems of mean-flow evolution. They also indicate the extent to which the net effect of the waves on the mean flow can be described by a ‘radiation stress’, and provide a general framework for explaining the asymmetry of radiation-stress tensors along the lines proposed by Jones (1973).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Euler–Poincaré Equations and Semidirect Products with Applications to Continuum Theories
Holm, D. D., Marsden, J. E., & Ratiu, T. S. (1998) · Advances in Mathematics · doi:10.1006/aima.1998.1721 · Cited by 964
An ocean large‐eddy simulation of Langmuir circulations and convection in the surface mixed layer
Skyllingstad, E. D., & Denbo, D. W. (1995) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/94jc03202 · Cited by 334
How well do we understand the dynamics of stratospheric warmings?
McIntyre, M. E. (1982) · Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser II · doi:10.2151/jmsj1965.60.1_37 · Cited by 317
Self-citationMechanisms of Jet Formation on the Giant Planets
Liu, J., & Schneider, T. (2010) · Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences · doi:10.1175/2010jas3492.1 · Cited by 135
Rhines, P. B. (1994) · Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · doi:10.1063/1.166011 · Cited by 101
Metadata
- Authors
- Andrews, D. G., & Mcintyre, M. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1978-12-27
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 609-646
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2077550432
- Cited by
- 749
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112078002773
- The paper
- Andrews, D. G., & Mcintyre, M. E. (1978). An exact theory of nonlinear waves on a Lagrangian-mean flow. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112078002773
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.