The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’
Abstract
From a series of experiments using simplified mechanical models we suggest certain minor modifications to the Weis-Fogh (1973)–Lighthill (1973) explanation of the so-called ‘clap and fling’ mechanism for the generation of large lift coefficients by insects in hovering flight. Of particular importance is the production and motion of a leading edge, separation vortex that accounts for virtually all of the circulation generated during the initial phase of the ‘fling’ process. The magnitude of this circulation is substantially larger than that calculated using inviscid theory. During the motion that subsequently separates the wings, the vorticity over each of them is convected and combined to become a tip vortex of uniform circulation spanning the space between them. This combined vortex moves downwards as a part of a ring, of large impulse, that is then continuously fed from quasi-steady separation bubbles that move with the wings as they continue to open at a large angle of attack. Such effects are able to account for the large lift forces generated by the insect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Classifications, applications, and design challenges of drones: A review
Hassanalian, M., & Abdelkefi, A. (2017) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.04.003 · Cited by 1,454
Unsteady Aerodynamic Performance of Model Wings at Low Reynolds Numbers
Dickinson, M. H., & Götz, K. G. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.174.1.45 · Cited by 668
Review of Experimental Work in Biomimetic Foils
Triantafyllou, M. S., Techet, A. H., & Hover, F. S. (2004) · IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering · doi:10.1109/joe.2004.833216 · Cited by 448
The aerodynamics of revolving wings I. Model hawkmoth wings
Usherwood, J. R., & Ellington, C. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.205.11.1547 · Cited by 398
Dragonfly Flight : II. Velocities, Accelerations and Kinematics of Flapping Flight
Wakeling, J. M., & Ellington, C. P. (1997) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.200.3.557 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Maxworthy, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1979-07-12
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-63
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2167263218
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022112079001774
- The paper
- Maxworthy, T. (1979). Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight. Part 1. Dynamics of the ‘fling’. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022112079001774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.