The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Boundary effects on electrophoretic motion of colloidal spheres
Abstract
An analysis is presented for electrophoretic motion of a charged non-conducting sphere in the proximity of rigid boundaries. An important assumption is that κ a → ∞, where a is the particle radius and κ is the Debye screening parameter. Three boundary configurations are considered: single flat wall, two parallel walls (slit), and a long circular tube. The boundary is assumed a perfect electrical insulator except when the applied field is directed perpendicular to a single wall, in which case the wall is assumed to have a uniform potential (perfect conductor). There are three basic effects causing the particle velocity to deviate from the value given by Smoluchowski's classic equation: first, a charge on the boundary causes electro-osmotic flow of the suspending fluid; secondly, the boundary alters the interaction between the particle and applied electric field; and, thirdly, the boundary enhances viscous retardation of the particle as it tries to move in response to the applied field. Using a method of reflections, we determine the particle velocity for a constant applied field in increasing powers of λ up to O(λ 6), where λ is the ratio of particle radius to distance from the boundary. Ignoring the O(λ 0) electro-osmotic effect, the first effect attributable to proximity of the boundary is O(λ 3) for all boundary configurations, and in cases when the applied field is parallel to the boundaries the electrophoretic velocity is proportional to ζ p − ζ w , the difference in zeta potential between the particle and boundary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Physical chemistry of surfaces
(1998) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-4499 · Cited by 11,648
Zeta Potential in Colloid Science
(1981) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-07389-6 · Cited by 2,328
Electrophoretic mobility of a spherical colloidal particle
O'Brien, R. W., & White, L. R. (1978) · Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions 2 · doi:10.1039/f29787401607 · Cited by 1,746
The slow motion of a sphere through a viscous fluid towards a plane surface
Brenner, H. (1961) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/0009-2509(61)80035-3 · Cited by 1,626
Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special applications to particulate media
Happel, J., & Brenner, H. (1983) · Mechanics of fluids and transport processes · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8352-6 · Cited by 1,354
Counting and Sizing of Submicron Particles by the Resistive Pulse Technique
DeBlois, R. W., & Bean, C. P. (1970) · Review of Scientific Instruments · doi:10.1063/1.1684724 · Cited by 655
The Stokes resistance of an arbitrary particle—IV Arbitrary fields of flow
Brenner, H. (1964) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/0009-2509(64)85084-3 · Cited by 255
Movement of a semipermeable vesicle through an osmotic gradient
Anderson, J. L. (1983) · The Physics of Fluids · doi:10.1063/1.864051 · Cited by 75
Self-citation
Cited by
Sze, A., Erickson, D., Ren, L., & Li, D. (2003) · Journal of Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/s0021-9797(03)00142-5 · Cited by 774
Electrokinetic particle translocation through a nanopore
Ai, Y., & Qian, S. (2011) · Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics · doi:10.1039/c0cp02267e · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Keh, H. J., & Anderson, J. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Fluid Mechanics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1985-04
- Volume
- 153
- Pages
- 417-439
- ISSN
- 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7645
- OpenAlex
- W2132087801
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Boundary effects on electrophoretic motion of colloidal spheres. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s002211208500132x
- The paper
- Keh, H. J., & Anderson, J. L. (1985). Boundary effects on electrophoretic motion of colloidal spheres. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002211208500132x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.