Cited by 1,173Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent FlowsFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows

A universal time scale for vortex ring formation

GHARIB, MORTEZA, RAMBOD, EDMOND, SHARIFF, KARIM·1998·Journal of Fluid Mechanics

Abstract

The formation of vortex rings generated through impulsively started jets is studied experimentally. Utilizing a piston/cylinder arrangement in a water tank, the velocity and vorticity fields of vortex rings are obtained using digital particle image velocimetry (DPIV) for a wide range of piston stroke to diameter ( L / D ) ratios. The results indicate that the flow field generated by large L / D consists of a leading vortex ring followed by a trailing jet. The vorticity field of the leading vortex ring formed is disconnected from that of the trailing jet. On the other hand, flow fields generated by small stroke ratios show only a single vortex ring. The transition between these two distinct states is observed to occur at a stroke ratio of approximately 4, which, in this paper, is referred to as the ‘formation number’. In all cases, the maximum circulation that a vortex ring can attain during its formation is reached at this non-dimensional time or formation number. The universality of this number was tested by generating vortex rings with different jet exit diameters and boundaries, as well as with various non-impulsive piston velocities. It is shown that the ‘formation number’ lies in the range of 3.6–4.5 for a broad range of flow conditions. An explanation is provided for the existence of the formation number based on the Kelvin–Benjamin variational principle for steady axis-touching vortex rings. It is shown that based on the measured impulse, circulation and energy of the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022112097008410

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a vortex ring produced by forcing fluid through an orifice into stationary ambient fluid, there is a critical formation number L/D of about 4 above which not all the fluid is incorporated into the ring.

    “They found that there was a critical value of the 'formation number' L/D (about 4 for an injection into a stationary ambient fluid) above which not all the fluid was incorporated into the ring.”

    From The efficiency of pulsed-jet propulsion (2011) · cites this paper as Gharib, Rambod & Shariff 1998

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GHARIB, M., RAMBOD, E., & SHARIFF, K.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Published
1998-04-10
Volume
360
Pages
121-140
ISSN
  • 0022-1120 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7645
OpenAlex
W2002454315
Cited by
1,173
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 62 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 59 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 42
FWCI
16.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Fluid Mechanics (publishedVersion)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Keywords
vortex ring formation, vorticity field, circulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review