The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood
Open accessAbstract
The survival rate,p, of a measured inoculum of Staph. aureus in a standard volume of denbrinated blood, is a reliable quantitative measure of the bactericidal power of blood. The number of viable organisms in the inoculum and in the blood-bacterium mixture may be estimated with the necessary accuracy by counts of colonies developing from measured volumes of the fluids let fall on to the surface of solid media. Fildes' agar was the most suitable medium for this surface-viable count, and was selected on the basis of four criteria; of the media tested it yielded the highest counts, and the counts conformed most closely to a Poisson series; and on it the mean colony size was maximum, and the coefficient of variation of colony size was minimum. On this medium, the close conformity of the separate count values to a Poisson series enabled the standard error of the survival rate to be determined from a simplification of the general expression for the standard error of a ratio. The number of colonies growing from a sample of a blood-bacterium mixture may be reduced, not by killing of the individual cocci, but as a result of their aggregation either by agglutinins in the blood, or in the cytoplasm of leucocytes that are phagocytic but not bactericidal. It appears that these mechanisms are unlikely to operate in blood-bacterium mixture containing relatively few organisms; in such mixtures the survival rate is a reflexion of the killing power only. The immunological significance of p has not been investigated, but the range of values for healthy human adults differs significantly from that for sufferers from chronic staphylococcal infection. Moreover, by the technique employed differences may be detected between individual values of p that cannot reasonably be attributed to technical or sampling errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
How to optimize the drop plate method for enumerating bacteria
Herigstad, B., Hamilton, M., & Heersink, J. (2001) · Journal of Microbiological Methods · doi:10.1016/s0167-7012(00)00241-4 · Cited by 965
Stark, P. L., & Lee, A. (1982) · Journal of Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00222615-15-2-189 · Cited by 616
Marine probiotics: increasing coral resistance to bleaching through microbiome manipulation
Rosado, P. M., Leite, D. C. A., Duarte, G. A. S., Chaloub, R. M., Jospin, G., Nunes da Rocha, U., Saraiva, J. P., Dini-Andreote, F., Eisen, J. A., Bourne, D. G., et al. (2019) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-018-0323-6 · Cited by 459
Galbraith, H., Miller, T. B., Paton, A. M., & Thompson, J. K. (1971) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1971.tb01019.x · Cited by 255
Cherrington, C. A., Hinton, M., Pearson, G. R., & Chopra, I. (1991) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1991.tb04442.x · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S., & Irwin, J. O.
- Venue
- Epidemiology and Infection
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1938-11
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 732-749
- ISSN
- 0950-2688 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-4409
- OpenAlex
- W2017821807
- Cited by
- 3,583
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s002217240001158x
- The paper
- Miles, A. A., Misra, S. S., & Irwin, J. O. (1938). The estimation of the bactericidal power of the blood. Epidemiology and Infection. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002217240001158x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.