The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Antibacterial Activity of Long Chain Fatty Acids and the Reversal with Calcium, Magnesium, Ergocalciferol and Cholesterol
Abstract
SUMMARY: Screening tests indicated that Gram positive bacteria are inhibited by long chain fatty acids. No inhibition was demonstrated with Gram negative bacteria. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for a series of the fatty acids are presented. Growth curves in the presence of linolenic acid showed increases in lag phase duration and calcium addition reversed this effect, thus indicating the arbitrary nature of the MIC values. Bactericidal studies showed lauric acid to be the most active saturated fatty acid but the activity was less than that of the C 18 unsaturated fatty acids. Oleic acid was more effective than elaidic acid. Calcium ions, cholesterol and ergocalciferol reversed the activities of lauric and linoleic acids but magnesium ions effectively counteracted lauric acid only. A physicochemical explanation for the relative activities has been attempted.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sodium oleate was used as a model for LCFA because it is generally the most abundant LCFA in wastewater, has good solubility, is the most important LCFA produced by whole milk degradation, and is one of the more toxic LCFA.
“Sodium oleate was used as a model for LCFA because it is, in general, the most abundant of all LCFA present in wastewater (Komatsu et al., 1991), has a good solubility, it is the most important LCFA produced by whole milk degradation (Hanaki et al., 1981) and is one of the more toxic LCFA (Galbraith et al., 1971).”
From Effects of lipids and oleic acid on biomass development in anaerobic fixed-bed reactors. Part II: Oleic acid toxicity and biodegradability (2001) · cites this paper as Galbraith et al., 1971
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- 10.1039/tf9494500528 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0022029900017933 · DOI
- Bean H. S., 1967, Types and characteristics of disinfectants, J. appl. Bact., 30, 10
- 10.1002/jsfa.2740170907 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9861(57)90121-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9861(63)90393-X · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-9861(63)90394-1 · DOI
- 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(51)91832-2 · DOI
- 10.1079/BJN19660049 · DOI
- 10.1079/BJN19690104 · DOI
- ElHag G. A.(1969).Ph.D. thesis. University of Aberdeen.
- El Hag G. A., 1971, Evaluation of whisky distillery byproducts VI. The reduction in digestibility of malt distillers grains by fatty acids and the interaction with calcium and other reversal agents, J. Sci. Fd Agric., 23
- Farquhar J. W., 1959, Analysis of fatty acid mixtures, Nutr. Rev., 17
- 10.1093/infdis/38.1.66 · DOI
- Hamilton W. A., 1968, The mechanism of the bacteriostatic action of tetrachlorosalicylanilide, a membrane‐active antibacterial compound, J. gen. Microbiol., 50, 411, 10.1099/00221287-50-3-441 · DOI
- Hirt R., 1953, Biophysikalische studien mit dem tensiometer. 3. Mitteilung, Arzneimittel-Forsch., 3, 297
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1946.tb36181.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1967.tb00273.x · DOI
- 10.1042/bj0390078 · DOI
- Kodicek E., 1949, The effect of unsaturated fatty acids on Gram positive bacteria, Symp. Soc. exp. Biol., 111, 127
- Kodicek E., 1958, Further studies on the effect of linoleic acid on Lactobacillus casei, J. gen. Microbiol., 18, xiii
- 10.1017/S002217240001158X · DOI
- Minami K., 1957, Bactericidal action of oleic acid for tubercle bacilli. I. Quantitative and analytical survey of the action, J. Bact., 73, 338, 10.1128/jb.73.3.338-344.1957 · DOI
- Netter H., 1969, Theoretical Biochemistry
- Nieman C., 1954, Influence of trace amounts of fatty acids on the growth of micro‐organisms, Bact. Rev., 18, 147, 10.1128/br.18.2.147-163.1954 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.1938.0061 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01766659 · DOI
- Willett N. P., 1966, Long chain fatty acid inhibition of growth of Streptococcus agalactiae in a chemically defined medium, J. Bact., 91, 2245, 10.1128/jb.91.6.2245-2250.1966 · DOI
- 10.1099/00221287-44-3-343 · DOI
- 10.1093/infdis/86.1.33 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Factors affecting odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in milk: A review
Vlaeminck, B., Fievez, V., Cabrita, A. R. J., Fonseca, A. J. M., & Dewhurst, R. J. (2006) · Animal Feed Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.06.017 · Cited by 750
The Properties of Lauric Acid and Their Significance in Coconut Oil
Dayrit, F. M. (2015) · Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society · doi:10.1007/s11746-014-2562-7 · Cited by 479
Maia, M. R., Chaudhary, L. C., Bestwick, C. S., Richardson, A. J., McKain, N., Larson, T. R., Graham, I. A., & Wallace, R. J. (2010) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/1471-2180-10-52 · Cited by 298
Microbiological screening of the straight chain fatty acids (c1‐c12) as potential silage additives
Woolford, M. K. (1975) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740260213 · Cited by 259
Alves, M. M., Mota Vieira, J. A., Álvares Pereira, R. M., Pereira, M. A., & Mota, M. (2001) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(00)00242-6 · Cited by 163
Evaluation of microalgae and cyanobacteria as potential sources of antimicrobial compounds
Alsenani, F., Tupally, K. R., Chua, E. T., Eltanahy, E., Alsufyani, H., Parekh, H. S., & Schenk, P. M. (2020) · Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2020.11.010 · Cited by 149
Nanotechnology Formulations for Antibacterial Free Fatty Acids and Monoglycerides
Jackman, J., Yoon, B., Li, D., & Cho, N.-J. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21030305 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Galbraith, H., Miller, T. B., Paton, A. M., & Thompson, J. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1971-12
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 803-813
- ISSN
- 0021-8847
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review