Long-term psychosocial impact of otoplasty performed on children with prominent ears
Abstract
Objectives To investigate the psychosocial impact of prominent ears on children, and evaluate the outcomes of otoplasty two years after surgery, using the Child Behavior Checklist to comparatively evaluate patients' psychosocial profiles. Method and results A total of 198 otoplasty procedures were performed in 107 patients (85 per cent bilateral procedures). Otoplasty was performed solely in 86 patients and concurrently with other procedures in 21 patients. All children who underwent surgery obtained good post-operative results, with satisfactory correction of the deformity reported by the patients and their parents or guardians. There were statistically significant decreases in Child Behavior Checklist scores in the domains of: anxiety and depression (p = 0.028), social problems (p = 0.018), difficulties in thinking (p = 0.012), total behavioural problems (p = 0.012), internalising problems (p = 0.020) and externalising problems (p = 0.044), and near-significant decreases in scores for attention problems (p = 0.055) and aggressive behaviour (p = 0.078). There was a statistically significant increase in the score for total social competence (p = 0.031). Conclusion Psychological problems associated with anatomical deformities such as prominent ears can be reduced by means of appropriate corrective surgery. Psychological support is necessary for the patient.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Psychosocial Outcome of Patients After Ear Reconstruction: A Retrospective Study of 62 Patients
Horlock, N., V??gelin, E., Bradbury, E. T., Grobbelaar, A. O., & Gault, D. T. (2005) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sap.0000155284.96308.32 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
Psychosocial adjustment in children with port-wine stains and prominent ears
SHEERIN, D., MACLEOD, M., & KUSUMAKAR, V. (1995) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/00004583-199512000-00014 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The psychological, social and educational impact of prominent ears: a systematic review
Jones, E. S., Gibson, J. A. G., Dobbs, T. D., & Whitaker, I. S. (2020) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2020.05.075 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Nonsurgical Management of Congenital Auricular Anomalies
Lennon, C., & Chinnadurai, S. (2018) · Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2017.09.001 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Otoplasty for prominent ears—demographics and surgical timing in different populations.
Kajosaari, L., Pennanen, J., & Klockars, T. (2017) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.06.014 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Bhatti, S. L., Daly, L. T., Mejia, M., & Perlyn, C. (2021) · Pediatrics In Review · doi:10.1542/pir.2019-0167 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Proposal of a classification system for the assessment and treatment of prominent ear deformity
Lee, Y., Kim, Y. S., Lee, W. J., Rha, D. K., & Kim, J. (2018) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-017-1061-2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Alper, D. P., Almeida, M. N., Craver, A., Hosseini, H., De Baun, H. M., Moscarelli, J., Collar, J. L., Parikh, N., Shah, J., & Alperovich, M. (2024) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-023-03523-8 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Prospective evaluation of psychological healing in adults who underwent otoplasty for prominent ear.
Kurt Ozkaya, N., Mert, D. G., Bitgen, M., & Çepni, M. (2020) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-020-01758-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Otoplasty Surgical Techniques and Clinical Outcomes: A Practical Review
Kaleeny, J. D., & Janis, J. E. (2026) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000007404
- Authors
- Songu, M., & Kutlu, A.
- Affiliations
- Izmir Kâtip Çelebi University (TR)
- Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastalıkları Hastanesi (TR)
- Corresponding author
- Songu, M
- Venue
- The Journal of Laryngology & Otology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2014-08-13
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 768-771
- ISSN
- 0022-2151 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-5460
- OpenAlex
- W2162539285
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 2.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Laryngology & Otology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- otoplasty, prominent ears, children, psychosocial outcomes, Child Behavior Checklist, anxiety, depression, social problems, internalizing problems, externalizing problems, social competence, psychological support, cosmetic surgery
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Child, Child Behavior Disorders, Child, Preschool, Depression, Ear, External, Esthetics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Self Concept, Social Adjustment, Otologic Surgical Procedures, Cohort Studies, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review