Ear molding therapy of congenital ear anomalies: long-term aesthetic outcomes and caretaker satisfaction.
Abstract
Introduction Ear molding is a safe, non-surgical approach to treat newborns with congenital ear anomalies. In this study, we aimed to investigate long-term aesthetic outcomes and caretaker satisfaction from ear molding therapy.Methods A retrospective chart review from 2018 to 2020 was conducted for infants who underwent ear molding treatment at our institution. Patient demographics and treatment related variables were collected. Caretakers were surveyed regarding their experience, expectations, and aesthetic outcome at 1 year (short-term) and 3 years (long-term) from treatment. Independent physicians evaluated treatment efficacy. Responses were converted to a Likert scale (1-5), with 5 representing most desirable.Results Overall, 38 of 42 patients participated in our long-term study (90%) for a total of 62 ears. Average follow-up was 3.31 ± 0.50 years after completion of treatment. Mean age at treatment was 23.2 ± 19.7 days with a mean treatment duration of 21.7 ± 7.7 days. Caretakers' satisfaction regarding auricular appearance remained high (short-term: 4.18 vs. long-term: 4.17, p = 0.54) and anticipated social distress decreased over time. Physician aesthetic evaluations were favorable between "somewhat effective" and "very effective" and remained consistent over time (short term: 3.46 vs. long-term: 3.31, p = 0.31). Furthermore, physician evaluations were higher for deformations than malformations (p = 0.04) and in children who began treatment by 30 days old (p = 0.04).Conclusion Caretaker satisfaction from ear molding therapy remained high after long-term follow up, and social distress from the perception of their child's ears decreased with time. Physician aesthetic ratings confirmed efficacy, with better outcomes seen in deformations than in malformations.Level of evidence iv This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Virtually all studies evaluating ear molding efficacy have focused on short-term results, with follow-up limited to less than a few years.
“Virtually all studies evaluating ear molding efficacy have focused on short-term results, with follow-up limited to less than a few years.7,9–16”
From Long-term Outcomes of Infant Ear Molding: A 10-year Single-Surgeon Experience (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
Matsuo, K., Hirose, T., Tomono, T., Iwasawa, M., Katohda, S., Takahashi, N., & Koh, B. (1984) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-198401000-00009 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Ear Molding in Newborn Infants with Auricular Deformities
Byrd, H. S., Langevin, C.-J., & Ghidoni, L. A. (2010) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0b013e3181e617bb · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Complications of otoplasty: a literature review.
Limandjaja, G. C., Breugem, C. C., Mink van der Molen, A. B., & Kon, M. (2009) · Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.043 · Cited by 151 · cited 1× · see citing works
“With surgical complication rates as high as 10%, the ability to intervene without the use of surgery in the neonatal period has been a paradigm shift [16].”
Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children
Bradbury, E. T., Hewison, J., & Timmons, M. J. (1992) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0007-1226(92)90165-t · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Molding therapy for infants with deformational auricular anomalies
Tan, S. T., Abramson, D. L., MacDonald, D. M., & Mulliken, J. B. (1997) · Annals of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1097/00000637-199703000-00013 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Unconjugated estrogens in the perinatal period
Kenny, F. M., Angsusingha, K., Stinson, D., & Hotghkiss, J. (1973) · Pediatric Research · doi:10.1203/00006450-197310000-00006 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Non-surgical correction of a congenital lop ear deformity by splinting with Reston foam
Kurozumi, N., Ono, S., & Ishida, H. (1982) · British Journal of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1016/0007-1226(82)90160-6 · Cited by 92 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Prior to the first description of ear molding technique in the 1980s by Kurozumi et al., surgical correction at school age was the only available treatment option for congenital ear anomalies [15].”
Daniali, L. N., Rezzadeh, K., Shell, C., Trovato, M., Ha, R., & Byrd, H. S. (2017) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000003150 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Psychosocial Effects of Otoplasty in Children with Prominent Ears
Gasques, J. Á. L., de Godoy, J. M. P., & Cruz, E. M. T. N. (2008) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-008-9179-x · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Nonsurgical correction of congenital ear abnormalities in the newborn: case series
Smith, W., Toye, J., Reid, A., & Smith, R. (2005) · Paediatrics & Child Health · doi:10.1093/pch/10.6.327 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Chan, S. L. S., Lim, G. J. S., Por, Y. C., Chiang, M. F., Ho, S., Saffari, S. E., & Chia, H.-L. (2019) · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000006057 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Correction of Congenital Auricular Deformities Using the Ear-Molding Technique
Woo, T., Kim, Y. S., Roh, T. S., Lew, D. H., & Yun, I. S. (2016) · Archives of Plastic Surgery · doi:10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.512 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Long-term psychosocial impact of otoplasty performed on children with prominent ears
Songu, M., & Kutlu, A. (2014) · The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · doi:10.1017/s0022215114001662 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Newborn ear deformities: early recognition and novel nonoperative techniques
Schultz, K., Guillen, D., & Maricevich, R. (2017) · Seminars in Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1603958 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
(2012) · PubMed · Cited by 31 · see citing works
A simplified nonsurgical method for the correction of neonatal deformational auricular anomalies.
Chang, C. S., & Bartlett, S. P. (2017) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922816641368 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Deformations of the Ear and Their Nonsurgical Correction
Chang, C. S., & Bartlett, S. P. (2019) · Clinical Pediatrics · doi:10.1177/0009922819844296 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Non-surgical Management of Congenital Auricular Deformities.
(2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Nonsurgical Management of Congenital Auricular Anomalies
Lennon, C., & Chinnadurai, S. (2018) · Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2017.09.001 · Cited by 28 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, the optimal age of starting treatment is debated, with suggestions from different groups varying from \ 3 weeks, to between 7 days and 6 weeks, to within the first 6 weeks of life [19–21].”
Anthropometric research of congenital auricular deformities for newborns
Zhao, H., Lin, G., Seong, Y. H., Shi, J., Xu, J., & Huang, W. (2019) · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · doi:10.1080/14767058.2017.1402877 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Efficacy and Timing of Neonatal Ear Correction Molding
Zhuang, Q., Wei, N., Zhou, Q. D., Wang, H., Wu, Y., Chen, Z., Yu, D., Wang, P., & Shi, H. (2020) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-019-01596-y · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Vincent (2019) · doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2018.06.011 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Dinis, J., Junn, A., Long, A. S., Phillips, S. M., Reategui, A. A., Kaplan, A., & Alperovich, M. A. (2021) · Aesthetic Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00266-021-02610-y · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Chen, P. W., Li, J., Sq, Z., Js, Y., Dou, J., & Cy, W. (2017) · PubMed · doi:10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.11.008 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lv, M.-S., Liu, Y.-J., Chen, P.-W., Zhu, J.-K., Qiu, W.-X., Wang, D.-N., & Zhao, S.-Q. (2024) · The Journal of craniofacial surgery (Print) · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000010125 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Long-term Outcomes of Infant Ear Molding: A 10-year Single-Surgeon Experience
Wu, M., Chang, A. E., Platukus, A. M., Massenburg, B. B., Byrns, C. N., Romeo, D. J., Ng, J. J., Swanson, J. W., Taylor, J. A., & Bartlett, S. P. (2025) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open · doi:10.1097/gox.0000000000006673 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“16 As such, the appearance of treated ears through elementary age, which is important for assessing the durability of outcomes, has not been investigated.”
InfluentialQu, C., Wei, Q., Wang, A., Fan, X., Zhang, S., & Liu, N. (2026) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000012554
Alanazi, F., Almousa, H. M., AlAbdulkarim, I., Alhamoudi, A., Alruwaili, R., & Almezel, S. (2026) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0000000000012978
Yang, Q., Yang, K., Liu, Y., Wang, J., & 冯国平 (2026) · International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology · doi:10.1016/j.ijporl.2026.112992
- Authors
- Alper, D. P., Almeida, M. N., Craver, A., Hosseini, H., De Baun, H. M., Moscarelli, J., Collar, J. L., Parikh, N., Shah, J., & Alperovich, M.
- Affiliations
- Yale University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Alperovich, Michael
- ORCID
- Venue
- Aesthetic Plastic Surgery
- Published
- 2023-08-11
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1241-1248
- ISSN
- 0364-216X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-5241
- OpenAlex
- W4385751955
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- congenital ear anomalies, ear deformity, auricular malformation, social distress, treatment timing, infants
- MeSH terms
- Congenital Abnormalities, Ear, External, Esthetics, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Retrospective Studies, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Caregivers, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review