Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Narratives of Crisis in the Periphery of São Paulo: Place and Political Articulation during Brazil's Rightward Turn

Richmond, Matthew Aaron·2020·Journal of Latin American Studies

Abstract

Between 2014 and 2018, a period marked by major political and economic upheaval, Brazilian politics shifted sharply to the Right. Presenting qualitative research conducted over 2016–17, this article examines this process from the perspectives of residents of a peripheral São Paulo neighbourhood. Analysis is presented of three broad groups of respondents, each of which mobilised a distinct narrative framework for interpreting the crisis. Based on this, I argue that the rightward turn in urban peripheries embodies not a significant ideological shift, but rather long-term transformations of place and the largely contingent ways these articulate with electoral politics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0022216x20000012

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Feltran, 2011, Fronteiras de tensão: Política e violência nas periferias de São Paulo
  2. Pochman, 2012, Nova classe média? O trabalho social na base da pirâmide social brasileira
  3. 10.1590/S0103-49792011000100012 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1590/1807-0191201824153 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Almeida, 2018, O voto do brasileiro
  6. 10.1177/0263775816658479 · DOI
  7. 10.1017/S0022216X15001200 · DOI
  8. de Almeida, Bolsonaro presidente: Conservadorismo, evangelismo e a crise brasileira, Novos Estudos CEBRAP, 38, 185
  9. Abramo, 2017, Percepções e valores políticos nas periferias de São Paulo
  10. Almeida, 2016, Democratic Brazil Divided, 175
  11. 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2015.00280.x · DOI
  12. Neri, 2011, A nova classe média: O lado brilhante da base da pirâmide
  13. Souza, 2012, Os batalhadores brasileiros: Nova classe média ou nova classe trabalhadora?
  14. Braga, 2013, Para onde vai o precariado brasileiro? Sindicalismo e hegemonia no Brasil contemporâneo, Perseu, 10, 35
  15. Singer, 2018, O Lulismo em crise: Uma quebra cabeça do período Dilma (2011–2016)
  16. 10.1590/S0102-69092004000300002 · DOI
  17. 10.1590/1807-0191201824129 · DOI
  18. Pinheiro-Machado, 2018, O ódio como política: A reinvenção das direitas no Brasil
  19. 10.1515/9780804794985 · DOI
  20. McQuarrie, 2017, The Revolt of the Rust Belt: Place and Politics in the Age of Anger, The British Journal of Sociology, 68, S120, 10.1111/1468-4446.12328 · DOI
  21. Singer, 2012, Os sentidos do lulismo: Reforma gradual e pacto conservador

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Richmond, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Latin American Studies
Published
2020-02-18
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
241-267
ISSN
  • 0022-216X
  • 1469-767X
Cited by
14
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review