Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras
Open accessAbstract
Resumo O debate recente sobre identificação partidária e comportamento eleitoral no Brasil vem apontando para a crescente importância do posicionamento dos eleitores com respeito aos principais partidos presidenciais – PT e PSDB – na escolha dos candidatos à presidência. Neste artigo, procura-se contribuir para a literatura colocando em questionamento diagnósticos recentes com respeito à polarização do sistema partidário presidencial. De acordo com a hipótese da polarização, a competição eleitoral entre PT e PSDB levou a uma crescente divisão do eleitorado em dois blocos claramente diferenciados e polarizados. Argumentamos que esta hipótese se apoia em bases teóricas e empíricas frágeis. Não obstante a crescente importância dos sentimentos partidários na determinação do comportamento dos eleitores no pleito presidencial, os resultados das análises descritivas e modelos estatísticos multivariados com base nos surveys do Estudo Eleitoral Brasileiro (Eseb) realizados nos anos de 2002, 2006, 2010 e 2014 demonstram que não há evidências de que tal movimento estaria associado a um aumento da polarização partidária de massa. Pelo contrário, observamos que as diferenças ideológicas e de opinião entre petistas e tucanos são de pequena monta e, além disso, encontramos evidências de uma crescente convergência ideológica entre os vários segmentos do eleitorado ao longo do tempo.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ideological self-placement is highly endogenous to presidential candidate affect.
“past research has consistently found ideological self-placement to be highly endogenous to presidential candidate affect (e.g. Baker et al. 2016; Borges and Vidigal 2018)”
From Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil (2022) · cites this paper as Borges and Vidigal 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Ideologia e comportamento político no eleitorado brasileiro
Oliveira, C., & Turgeon, M. (2015) · Opinião Pública · doi:10.1590/1807-01912015213574 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Them’ without ‘us’: Negative identities and affective polarization in Brazil
Areal, J. (2022) · Political Research Exchange · doi:10.1080/2474736x.2022.2117635 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Borges, A., & Vidigal, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- Venue
- Opinião Pública
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 53-89
- ISSN
- 0104-6276 (ISSN-L)
- 1807-0191
- OpenAlex
- W2804928889
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 30.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- pt
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Opinião Pública (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Keywords
- party identification, voting behavior, presidential elections, political polarization, partisanship, PT, PSDB, Lulismo, ideological convergence, Brazilian voters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review