Cited by 83Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationPolitical Dynamics in Latin AmericaPolitics and Society in Latin America

Do lulismo ao antipetismo? Polarização, partidarismo e voto nas eleições presidenciais brasileiras

Open access
Borges, André, Vidigal, Robert·2018·Opinião Pública

Abstract

Resumo O debate recente sobre identificação partidária e comportamento eleitoral no Brasil vem apontando para a crescente importância do posicionamento dos eleitores com respeito aos principais partidos presidenciais – PT e PSDB – na escolha dos candidatos à presidência. Neste artigo, procura-se contribuir para a literatura colocando em questionamento diagnósticos recentes com respeito à polarização do sistema partidário presidencial. De acordo com a hipótese da polarização, a competição eleitoral entre PT e PSDB levou a uma crescente divisão do eleitorado em dois blocos claramente diferenciados e polarizados. Argumentamos que esta hipótese se apoia em bases teóricas e empíricas frágeis. Não obstante a crescente importância dos sentimentos partidários na determinação do comportamento dos eleitores no pleito presidencial, os resultados das análises descritivas e modelos estatísticos multivariados com base nos surveys do Estudo Eleitoral Brasileiro (Eseb) realizados nos anos de 2002, 2006, 2010 e 2014 demonstram que não há evidências de que tal movimento estaria associado a um aumento da polarização partidária de massa. Pelo contrário, observamos que as diferenças ideológicas e de opinião entre petistas e tucanos são de pequena monta e, além disso, encontramos evidências de uma crescente convergência ideológica entre os vários segmentos do eleitorado ao longo do tempo.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/1807-0191201824153

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borges, A., & Vidigal, R.
Affiliations
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Venue
Opinião Pública
Published
2018-04
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
53-89
ISSN
  • 0104-6276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1807-0191
OpenAlex
W2804928889
Cited by
83
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
30.46
Type
journal article
Language
pt
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Opinião Pública (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
Keywords
party identification, voting behavior, presidential elections, political polarization, partisanship, PT, PSDB, Lulismo, ideological convergence, Brazilian voters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review