The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2
Abstract
Transitivity, mood and theme. Part I of this paper (sections 1–3) was an attempt to sketch some of the principal syntactic options, having the clause as point of origin, that are available to the speaker of English for the representation of processes and relations, and of objects, persons &c. as participants in them. The term ‘transitivity’ was used as a general label for this area of grammatical selection. Part II (sections 4–7) is concerned with another range of grammatical options, also associated with the clause, for which ‘theme’ is being used as the cover term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics
Roberts, C. (2012) · Semantics and Pragmatics · doi:10.3765/sp.5.6 · Cited by 1,919
Cognitive Status and the form of Referring Expressions in Discourse
Gundel, J., Hedberg, N., & Zacharski, R. (2019) · The Oxford Handbook of Reference · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199687305.013.5 · Cited by 1,645
Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking
Clark, H. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00017-3 · Cited by 1,235
Use of Top-Level Structure in Text: Key for Reading Comprehension of Ninth-Grade Students
Meyer, B. J. F., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.2307/747349 · Cited by 699
Discourse structure, topicality and questioning
Kuppevelt, J. V. (1995) · Journal of Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s002222670000058x · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Halliday, M. A. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Linguistics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1967-10
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-244
- ISSN
- 0022-2267 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7742
- OpenAlex
- W2166919574
- Cited by
- 2,090
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 110.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022226700016613
- The paper
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700016613
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.