The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Informal Income Opportunities and Urban Employment in Ghana
Abstract
This article originated in the study of one Northern Ghanaian group, the Frafras, as migrants to the urban areas of Southern Ghana. It describes the economic activities of the low-income section of the labour force in Accra, the urban sub-proletariat into which the unskilled and illiterate majority of Frafra migrants are drawn. Price inflation, inadequate wages, and an increasing surplus to the requirements of the urban labour market have led to a high degree of informality in the income-generating activities of the sub-proletariat. Consequently income and expenditure patterns are more complex than is normally allowed for in the economic analysis of poor countries. Government planning and the effective application of economic theory in this sphere has been impeded by the unthinking transfer of western categories to the economic and social structures of African cities. The question to be answered is this: Does the ‘reserve army of urban unemployed and underemployed’ really constitute a passive, exploited majority in cities like Accra, or do their informal economic activities possess some autonomous capacity for generating growth in the incomes of the urban (and rural) poor?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Takyi, B. K. (2001) · Sociological Focus · doi:10.1080/00380237.2001.10571184 · Cited by 81
Hammer, A. (2019) · Review of International Political Economy · doi:10.1080/09692290.2018.1554537 · Cited by 32
‘New’ terrains of precarity – gig work in India
Nair, G. (2022) · Contemporary South Asia · doi:10.1080/09584935.2022.2099813 · Cited by 31
(2008) · OECD Development Centre Working Papers · doi:10.1787/245657753644 · Cited by 10
Histories of User-Generated Content: Between Formal and Informal Media Economies
Lobato, R., Thomas, J., & Hunter, D. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1749803 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hart, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Modern African Studies
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1973-03
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-89
- ISSN
- 0022-278X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7777
- OpenAlex
- W2129874640
- Cited by
- 3,206
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.