Carinachitiids, hexangulaconulariids, and Punctatus: problematic metazoans from the Early Cambrian of South China
Abstract
Carinachitiids, hexangulaconulariids, andPunctatusare distinctive and abundant components of early skeletal faunas from the Lower Cambrian of South China. Carinachitiids are redescribed on the basis ofCarinachites spinatusfromKuanchuanpu, Shaanxi, andC. tetrasulcatusandC. curvatornatusfrom Emei, Sichuan. Tubes of all species are characterized by pronounced quadriradial symmetry, but whereasC. spinatusandC. curvatornatusgenerally have prominent ornamentation consisting of transverse ribbing, that ofC. tetrasulcatusis much more subdued. Neither apex nor well-defined aperture is evident in any of the carinachitiids. Hexangulaconulariids are redescribed on the basis ofArthrochites emeishanensisfrom Emei andHexaconularia sichuanensisfrom Kuanchuanpu. In common with the carinachitiids, the former species shows wide morphological variability. The tubes expand rapidly from a blunt apex, bear prominent ribbing, and possess variably developed lateral grooves that impose a quasi-hexaradial symmetry.Hexaconularia sichuanensisis described from fragmentary material with prominent ribbing and well-defined lateral grooves.Punctatus emeiensishas a tapering ribbed cone, with a stellate ornamentation adapically that is replaced by longitudinal ribbing towards the aperture. Carinachitiids and hexangulaconulariids are widely regarded as related to conularids, and this proposal receives additional support here. An external abortive ?borehole in a specimen ofCarinachitesalso supports the tubicolous interpretation of these fossils. An alternative suggestion that carinachitiids and hexangulaconulariids represent the internal rachis of a sea-pen is also considered. The affinities ofPunctatusare more speculative, but the genus may be related to the other two groups. The ecology ofPunctatus, however, remains problematic.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Steiner, M., Li, G., Qian, Y., Zhu, M., & Erdtmann, B.-D. (2007) · Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology · doi:10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.03.046 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
The earliest Cambrian record of animals and ocean geochemical change
Maloof, A. C., Porter, S. M., Moore, J. L., Dudas, F. O., Bowring, S. A., Higgins, J. A., Fike, D. A., & Eddy, M. P. (2010) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30346.1 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa
Morris, S. C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361219a0 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Self-citationFossilized Metazoan Embryos from the Earliest Cambrian
Bengtson, S., & Zhao, Y. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5332.1645 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization
KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S., RUNNEGAR, B., SKOVSTED, C., STEINER, M., & VENDRASCO, M. (2012) · Geological Magazine · doi:10.1017/s0016756811000720 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
The ‘biomineralization toolkit’ and the origin of animal skeletons
Murdock, D. J. E. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12614 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Darwin's dilemma: the realities of the Cambrian ‘explosion’
Conway Morris, S. (2006) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2006.1846 · Cited by 179 · see citing works
Van Iten, H., de Moraes Leme, J., Simões, M. G., Marques, A. C., & Collins, A. G. (2006) · Journal of Systematic Palaeontology · doi:10.1017/s1477201905001793 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Bicknell, R. D. C., & Paterson, J. R. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12365 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Escalation and ecological selectively of mineralogy in the Cambrian Radiation of skeletons
Wood, R., & Zhuravlev, A. Y. (2012) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.10.002 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Van Iten, H., Leme, J. M., Pacheco, M. L. A. F., Simões, M. G., Fairchild, T. R., Rodrigues, F., Galante, D., Boggiani, P. C., & Marques, A. C. (2016) · The Cnidaria, Past, Present and Future · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-31305-4_3 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
EARLY CAMBRIAN METAZOAN EGGS, EMBRYOS, AND PHOSPHATIC MICROFOSSILS FROM NORTHWESTERN CANADA
PYLE, L. J., NARBONNE, G. M., NOWLAN, G. S., XIAO, S., & JAMES, N. P. (2006) · Journal of Paleontology · doi:10.1666/0022-3360(2006)80[811:ecmeea]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morris, S. C., & Menge, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Academia Sinica (TW)
- Venue
- Journal of Paleontology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 384-406
- ISSN
- 0022-3360 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2337
- OpenAlex
- W2486140132
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Paleontology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- Lower Cambrian, conical tubes, ribbing, fossil taxonomy, South China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review