Mobergellans from the Lower Cambrian of Mongolia, Sweden, and the United States: molluscs or opercula of incertae sedis?
Abstract
Mobergellans are a distinctive group of Lower Cambrian breviconic shells with a prominent set of internal scars, presumably representing sites of former muscle attachment. Shells grew by accretion and appear to have secreted primary phosphate. Here a redescription is given of mobergellans, assigned to Hippoklosma new genus, from the Khairkhan Formation (Botomian-age equivalent) of southwest Mongolia.Hippoklosma mongolica(Missarzhevsky) is bilaterally symmetrical, with five pairs of radiating structures. These are presumably homologous with the muscle scars of other mobergellans, but in contrast consist of a series of disks (herein fibroplacodes) each containing a characteristic fibrous structure capped externally by a smooth lid. The apical region of the shell is domelike with transverse segmentation. A review of other mobergellans, including new data on Mobergella holsti from Sweden and Discinella micans from New York, and possibly related taxa concludes that although their affinities are problematic, a relationship with the Mollusca may be the most plausible hypothesis on existing evidence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mobergellids are low conical or disc-shaped calcium phosphate problematic fossils with evidence of accretionary growth and paired radiating (possibly, muscular) imprints on the interior side.
“Mobergellids are low conical or disc-shaped calcium phosphate problematic fossils with evidence of accretionary growth and paired radiating (possibly, muscular) imprints on the interior side”
From Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization (2012) · cites this paper as Conway Morris & Chapman, 1997
Cites
The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa
Morris, S. C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361219a0 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Lower Cambrian Fossil Record of the Soviet Union
Rozanov, A. Y., & Zhuravlev, A. Y. (1992) · Topics in Geobiology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2427-8_7 · Cited by 121 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The earliest Cambrian record of animals and ocean geochemical change
Maloof, A. C., Porter, S. M., Moore, J. L., Dudas, F. O., Bowring, S. A., Higgins, J. A., Fike, D. A., & Eddy, M. P. (2010) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b30346.1 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
Chronology of early Cambrian biomineralization
KOUCHINSKY, A., BENGTSON, S., RUNNEGAR, B., SKOVSTED, C., STEINER, M., & VENDRASCO, M. (2012) · Geological Magazine · doi:10.1017/s0016756811000720 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
- Authors
- Morris, S. C., & Chapman, A. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Paleontology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-11
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 968-984
- ISSN
- 0022-3360 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2337
- OpenAlex
- W2496774132
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2020: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Paleontology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Keywords
- Lower Cambrian, muscle scars, taxonomy, redescription
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review