The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom
Open accessAbstract
When women run in general elections for the U.S. House of Representatives, they win at approximately the same rates as their male counterparts. With the exception of studies of selected congressional districts in particular years, however, scholars have virtually ignored the gender dynamics of the congressional primary process. In this paper, we fill this void, analyzing data from 1958 to 2004 to test hypotheses about women's victory rates and levels of primary competition. Our analysis results in an additional explanation for women's underrepresentation: the congressional primary process. Although women generally do not win primaries at lower rates than their male counterparts, women in both parties face more primary competition than do men. Gender neutral victory rates, then, are not the result of a gender neutral primary process. Women have to be “better” than their male counterparts in order to fare equally well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes"
Mansbridge, J. (1999) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.2307/2647821 · Cited by 2,939
Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections
Bartels, L. M. (1996) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111700 · Cited by 1,321
The Role of Partisan Stereotypes in Information Processing about Political Candidates
Rahn, W. M. (1993) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111381 · Cited by 891
Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections
Mcdermott, M. L. (1998) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591299805100403 · Cited by 744
Gender as a Factor in the Attribution of Leadership Traits
Alexander, D., & Andersen, K. (1993) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591299304600305 · Cited by 628
Rule, W. (1987) · Western Political Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591298704000307 · Cited by 559
McDermott, M. L. (1997) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111716 · Cited by 546
Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office
Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2004) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00069.x · Cited by 541
Self-citationWomen's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries
Matland, R. E. (1998) · Legislative Studies Quarterly · doi:10.2307/440217 · Cited by 509
Do Citizens Apply Gender Stereotypes to Infer Candidates' Ideological Orientations?
Koch, J. W. (2000) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1111/0022-3816.00019 · Cited by 393
Cited by
The Ties That Double Bind: Social Roles and Women's Underrepresentation in Politics
TEELE, D. L., KALLA, J., & ROSENBLUTH, F. (2018) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055418000217 · Cited by 382
Schneider, M. C., Holman, M. R., Diekman, A. B., & McAndrew, T. (2016) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12268 · Cited by 369
Fox, R. L., & Lawless, J. L. (2011) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00484.x · Cited by 282
Self-citationSchwarz, S., & Coppock, A. (2022) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/716290 · Cited by 269
The Application of Social Role Theory to the Study of Gender in Politics
Schneider, M. C., & Bos, A. L. (2019) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.12573 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Lawless, J. L., & Pearson, K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 67-82
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W171876484
- Cited by
- 379
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 56.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s002238160708005x
- The paper
- Lawless, J. L., & Pearson, K. (2008). The Primary Reason for Women's Underrepresentation? Reevaluating the Conventional Wisdom. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002238160708005x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
