The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change
Abstract
Political parties in established democracies face a trade-off between changing their policy positions in pursuit of votes and adhering to their previous positions in order to reduce risks related to change. To reconcile this trade-off, parties seek information about public opinion. Past election performance is one such source of information. To date however, there is no consistent result on whether past elections affect party positioning. I highlight two factors that previous analysts have not considered: whether past election results affect the magnitude of parties’ policy shifts in the current election, and how the time elapsed since the last election moderates the relationship between past election results and party policy change. My analyses of 23 established democracies generate two conclusions with important implications for understanding party behavior and political representation: parties tend to shift their policies more when they have lost votes in the previous election than when they have gained votes; and the effect of past election results dissipates with the passage of time.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1914185 · Cited by 48,524
What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data
Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2082979 · Cited by 6,840
Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpi014 · Cited by 6,223
Spatial Models of Party Competition
Stokes, D. E. (1963) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1952828 · Cited by 1,964
A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties
Strom, K. (1990) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111461 · Cited by 1,687
Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945—1998
Budge, I., Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Tanenbaum, E., Fording, R. C., Hearl, D. J., Kim, H. M., Mcdonald, M. D., & Mendes, S. M. (2001) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780199244003.001.0001 · Cited by 1,260
An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change
Harmel, R., & Janda, K. (1994) · Journal of Theoretical Politics · doi:10.1177/0951692894006003001 · Cited by 969
A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage
Groseclose, T. (2001) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2669329 · Cited by 754
Adams, J., Clark, M., Ezrow, L., & Glasgow, G. (2006) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00199.x · Cited by 709
Prospect Theory, Rational Choice, and International Relations
Levy, J. S. (1997) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1111/0020-8833.00034 · Cited by 633
Cited by
Hainmueller, J., Mummolo, J., & Xu, Y. (2019) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2018.46 · Cited by 959
Abou-Chadi, T., & Krause, W. (2020) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s0007123418000029 · Cited by 507
Ezrow, L., De Vries, C., Steenbergen, M., & Edwards, E. (2011) · Party Politics · doi:10.1177/1354068810372100 · Cited by 381
Metadata
- Authors
- Somer-Topcu, Z.
- Venue
- The Journal of Politics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 238-248
- ISSN
- 0022-3816 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2508
- OpenAlex
- W2136767046
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 48.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0022381608090154
- The paper
- Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Timely Decisions: The Effects of Past National Elections on Party Policy Change. The Journal of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022381608090154
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
