Cited by 98Phonetics and Phonology ResearchVoice and Speech DisordersLinguistics and language evolution

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops

Idemaru, Kaori, Guion, Susan G.·2008·Journal of the International Phonetic Association

Abstract

This study explores acoustic correlates to the singleton vs. geminate stop length contrast in Japanese. The proposal examined is that multiple acoustic features covary with the stop length distinction and that these features are available in the signal as potential secondary cues. The results support the proposal, revealing the presence of several acoustic features covarying with the singleton vs. geminate contrast in both durational and non-durational domains. Specifically, the preceding vowel is longer, the following vowel is shorter, there are greater fundamental frequency and intensity changes from the preceding to the following vowel, and there is evidence of more creakiness in voice quality for geminate than singleton consonants. It is also demonstrated that the vowel durations, as well as fundamental frequency and intensity changes have fairly strong categorization power.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0025100308003459

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 39 · Cited by 98

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Lisker, 1958, The Tamil occlusives: short vs. long or voiced vs. voiceless?, Indian Linguistics, 19, 294
  2. Homma, 1981, Durational relationships between Japanese stops and vowels, Journal of Phonetics, 9, 273, 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30971-4 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/410949 · DOI
  4. Diehl, 2001, The role of speech perception in phonology, 123, 10.1163/9789004454095_010 · DOI
  5. Pitt, 1993, An empirical and meta-analytic evaluation of the phoneme identification task, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 699
  6. Nakajo, 1989, Nihongo no onin to akusento
  7. 10.1121/1.2000807 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1159/000261655 · DOI
  9. 10.1353/lan.2006.0146 · DOI
  10. Hankamer, 1989, Perception of consonant length: Voiceless stops in Turkish and Bengali, Journal of Phonetics, 17, 283, 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30445-0 · DOI
  11. 10.1121/1.1908183 · DOI
  12. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0146 · DOI
  13. 10.1177/002383098602900102 · DOI
  14. 10.1017/S0025100306002398 · DOI
  15. Hirayama, 1957, Nihongo oncho no kenkyu
  16. Lahiri, 1988, The timing of geminate consonants, Journal of Phonetics, 16, 327, 10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30506-6 · DOI
  17. Fujisaki, 1979, Frontiers of speech communication research, 177
  18. Catford, 1977, Fundamental problems in phonetics
  19. 10.1017/S0025100305002240 · DOI
  20. Vance, 1987, An introduction to Japanese phonology
  21. 10.1159/000261906 · DOI
  22. 10.1006/jpho.1999.0098 · DOI
  23. 10.1121/1.380986 · DOI
  24. Diehl, 1991, Cognition and the symbolic processes: Applied and ecological perspectives, 59
  25. Ham, 2001, Phonetic and phonological aspects of geminate timing
  26. 10.1121/1.410376 · DOI
  27. Abramson, 1992, Amplitude as a cue to word-initial consonant length: Pattani Malay, Haskins Laboratories Report on Speech Research, SR-109/110, 251
  28. 10.1121/1.417991 · DOI
  29. Campbell, 1999, A study of Japanese speech timing from the syllable perspective, Journal of Phonetic Society of Japan, 3, 29
  30. Ofuka, 2005, Perception of a Japanese geminate stop: The effect of the duration of the preceding/following vowel, Journal of Phonetic Society of Japan, 9, 59
  31. 10.1086/463959 · DOI
  32. Lehiste, 1970, Suprasegmentals
  33. 10.1159/000028448 · DOI
  34. 10.1121/1.4786023 · DOI
  35. 10.1017/CBO9780511486357 · DOI
  36. Fant, 1960, Acoustic theory of speech production
  37. 10.3758/BF03204273 · DOI
  38. Maddieson, 1985, Phonetic linguistics: Essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged, 203
  39. Idemaru Kaori . 2005. An acoustic and perceptual investigation of the geminate and singleton stop contrast in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon.
  40. 10.3758/BF03194561 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Idemaru, K., & Guion, S. G.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of the International Phonetic Association
Published
2008-07-22
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
167-186
ISSN
  • 0025-1003 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-3502
OpenAlex
W2100726791
Cited by
98
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the International Phonetic Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Linguistics and language evolution
Keywords
geminate stops, vowel duration, fundamental frequency, vocal intensity, creaky voice, prosodic segmentation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review