The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture
Abstract
Chemostats were used to study the relation between growth rate, the rate of nutrient uptake and internal and external nutrient concentrations of two nutrients simultaneously. (Monochrysis lutheri: phosphorus and vitamin B 12.) Growth rate and internal concentrations of both limiting and excess nutrients are related by simple rectangular hyperbolas. Control was shown to follow a threshold rather than multiplicative pattern; that is, non-limiting nutrients exert no control at all over the pattern of growth. The limiting nutrient was the one that showed the smallest cell quota: subsistence quota ratio. Monochrysis populations exhibited two modes of growth. ‘Slow adapted cells’ differed from ‘fast adapted cells’ in the values of the constants for the above relation. Uptake of both limiting and non-limiting nutrients was found to be controlled by internal as well as external substrate concentrations. There was thus a limit to luxury consumption of one nutrient when growth was limited by another. The mathematical model formulated for growth in a chemostat (equations (23)–(29)) allowed prediction of external and internal substrate concentrations and rates of uptake of two nutrients and of biomass, given only the input concentrations of the two nutrients and the dilution rate. This model should apply equally well to growth in batch cultures; its possible application to natural populations was discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phytoplankton Community Ecology: The Role of Limiting Nutrients
Tilman, D., Kilham, S. S., & Kilham, P. (1982) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.13.110182.002025 · Cited by 1,085
Sajjadi, B., Chen, W.-Y., Raman, A. A. A., & Ibrahim, S. (2018) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.050 · Cited by 535
Rhee, G., & Gotham, I. J. (1981) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1981.26.4.0635 · Cited by 375
Grover, J. P. (1991) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285254 · Cited by 271
Extraction of a weak climatic signal by an ecosystem
Taylor, A. H., Allen, J. I., & Clark, P. A. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416629a · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Droop, M. R.
- Venue
- Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1974-11
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 825-855
- ISSN
- 0025-3154 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7769
- OpenAlex
- W2171316695
- Cited by
- 767
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s002531540005760x
- The paper
- Droop, M. R. (1974). The nutrient status of algal cells in continuous culture. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002531540005760x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.