Cited by 196Climate variability and modelsEcosystem dynamics and resilienceMarine and coastal ecosystems

Extraction of a weak climatic signal by an ecosystem

Taylor, Arnold H., Allen, J. Icarus, Clark, Paul A.·2002·Nature

Abstract

The complexity of ecosystems can cause subtle and chaotic responses to changes in external forcing. Although ecosystems may not normally behave chaotically, sensitivity to external influences associated with nonlinearity can lead to amplification of climatic signals. Strong correlations between an El Niño index and rainfall and maize yield in Zimbabwe have been demonstrated; the correlation with maize yield was stronger than that with rainfall. A second example is the 100,000-year ice-age cycle, which may arise from a weak cycle in radiation through its influence on the concentration of atmospheric CO2 (ref. 5). Such integration of a weak climatic signal has yet to be demonstrated in a realistic theoretical system. Here we use a particular climatic phenomenon-the observed association between plankton populations around the UK and the position of the Gulf Stream-as a probe to demonstrate how a detailed marine ecosystem model extracts a weak signal that is spread across different meteorological variables. Biological systems may therefore respond to climatic signals other than those that dominate the driving variables.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/416629a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Changes in upper trophic level marine species may be amplified in comparison to changes in lower trophic levels.

    “However, changes in these species may be amplified in comparison to changes in lower trophic levels [97,98]”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, A. H., Allen, J. I., & Clark, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Plymouth Marine Laboratory (GB)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Arnold H.
Venue
Nature
Published
2002-04
Volume
416
Issue
6881
Pages
629-632
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1964964907
Cited by
196
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
9.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • Division of Ocean Sciences
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal ecosystems
Keywords
climate-ecosystem interactions, plankton populations, marine ecosystem models, El Niño, maize yield, rainfall, ice age cycles, atmospheric CO2, nonlinear sensitivity
MeSH terms
Animals, Climate, Computer Simulation, Fresh Water, United Kingdom, Models, Biological, Oceans and Seas, Plankton, Seawater, Temperature, Water Movements, Ecosystem, Biomass

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review