The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Species distribution and habitat exploitation of fauna associated with kelp (Laminaria Hyperborea) along the Norwegian Coast
Abstract
Fauna associated with the common kelp along the Norwegian coast, Laminaria hyperborea, was sampled at four sites covering 1000 km of coastline. Exploitation of the kelp habitat by the fauna, and the ways in which habitat size and seasonal variations affect the kelp fauna community were analysed. The study focused on mobile macrofauna, of which 238 species were found on 56 kelps sampled, with an average density of almost 8000 individuals per kelp. Amphipods and gastropods were the most diverse and abundant fauna groups. The species composition was different on the lamina, stipe (with epiphytic algae) and holdfast. A similar pattern of epiphyte- and holdfast-fauna composition was found for all regions. Lowest diversity and abundance were found on the lamina, and highest diversity in the holdfast. Highest abundance was found on the stipe in summer, but there were large variations between sites and seasons, from a few individuals to more than 80 000 animals per stipe. Neither seasonal changes nor variation in habitat volume affected the number of species significantly, but abundance was significantly related to season and habitat volume. These variations were most pronounced for stipe fauna. Laminaria hyperborea offers a heterogeneous habitat exploited by a diverse and abundant invertebrate community, its abundance depending on local and regional variations in kelp size.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Smale, D. A., Burrows, M. T., Moore, P., O'Connor, N., & Hawkins, S. J. (2013) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.774 · Cited by 530
Macrophytes as habitat for fauna
Christie, H., Norderhaug, K., & Fredriksen, S. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08351 · Cited by 421
Self-citationSeaweed aquaculture in Norway: recent industrial developments and future perspectives.
Stévant, P., Rebours, C., & Chapman, A. (2017) · Aquaculture International · doi:10.1007/s10499-017-0120-7 · Cited by 261
Peteiro, C., & Freire, Ó. (2013) · Journal of the World Aquaculture Society · doi:10.1111/jwas.12065 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Christie, H., Jørgensen, N. M., Norderhaug, K. M., & Waage-Nielsen, E.
- Venue
- Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 687-699
- ISSN
- 0025-3154 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7769
- OpenAlex
- W2002958430
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Species distribution and habitat exploitation of fauna associated with kelp (Laminaria Hyperborea) along the Norwegian Coast. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0025315403007653h
- The paper
- Christie, H., Jørgensen, N. M., Norderhaug, K. M., & Waage-Nielsen, E. (2003). Species distribution and habitat exploitation of fauna associated with kelp (Laminaria Hyperborea) along the Norwegian Coast. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0025315403007653h
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.