Cited by 56Marine and coastal plant biologyMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesSeaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epiphytism on Blades of the Edible Kelps Undaria pinnatifida and Saccharina latissima Farmed under Different Abiotic Conditions

Peteiro, César, Freire, Óscar·2013·Journal of the World Aquaculture Society

Abstract

The kelps Undaria pinnatifida and Saccharina latissima are economically valuable edible seaweeds. Although epiphytism is a major problem affecting the productivity and quality of farmed seaweeds, studies of its effects on kelp aquaculture are scarce. We investigated the effects of epiphytism in two U. pinnatifida and S. latissima culture grounds located in two different parts (exposed and sheltered) of a bay (ría) in Galicia (NW Spain). Epiphytic organisms on blades were identified and their abundance was documented. The percentage of the total blade covered with epiphytes was measured for both kelp species in order to estimate the blade biomass that must be discarded during processing for human consumption. Algae, hydroids, and crustaceans were the most common epiphytic organism on kelp blades; colonies of the hydroid Obelia geniculata and harpacticoid copepods were the most abundant epiphytes. Abundance of epiphytes on the blades of both kelps was significantly higher for fronds growing in the sheltered area of the bay compared to those farmed at the exposed location. Different environmental conditions and other factors, such as the proximity of mussel cultures to kelp cultures, may be important contributors to epiphytism. The results presented here can be used to devise better ways for kelp aquaculture facilities to diminish the negative effects of epiphytism.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jwas.12065

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Commercial kelp farming in north-western Spain (Galicia) is developed in culture areas with a high density of mussel floating rafts.

    “This is similar to other aquaculture practices in north-western Spain (Galicia) where commercial kelp farming is developed in culture areas with a high density of mussel floating rafts (Peteiro and Freire, 2013; Peteiro et al., 2016).”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. 10.1515/botm.1990.33.2.205 · DOI
  2. 10.1515/botm.1979.22.2.107 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1439-0485.1984.tb00310.x · DOI
  4. 10.1007/s10811-010-9649-9 · DOI
  5. 10.3354/meps018079 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF00049039 · DOI
  7. 10.1023/A:1007971615801 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00300-007-0272-4 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1749-7345.2005.tb00132.x · DOI
  10. 10.1017/S0025315403007653h · DOI
  11. 10.1023/B:AECO.0000035162.07481.1f · DOI
  12. Faucci A., 2000, Structure of an epiphytic hydroid community on Cystoseira at two sites of different wave exposure, Scientia Marina, 64, 255, 10.3989/scimar.2000.64s1255 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF00004006 · DOI
  14. Folke C., 1989, The role of ecosystems for a sustainable development of aquaculture, Ambio, 18, 234
  15. 10.1007/s10811-007-9298-9 · DOI
  16. Gili J. M., 1995, The ecology of marine benthic hydroids, Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review, 33, 351
  17. 10.1017/S0025315410001633 · DOI
  18. Kawashima S., 1993, Seaweed cultivation and marine ranching, 25
  19. 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2010.00418.x · DOI
  20. 10.1007/s11027-010-9275-5 · DOI
  21. Kuschel F. A., 1991, Abundance, effects and management of epiphytism in intertidal cultures of Gracilaria (Rhodophyta) in southern Chile, Aquaculture and Fisheries Management, 92, 7
  22. 10.1080/09670260600645659 · DOI
  23. 10.3354/meps077271 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00710.x · DOI
  25. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021936 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00787.x · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s10811-010-9635-2 · DOI
  28. 10.1007/s10811-011-9755-3 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/s10811-008-9329-1 · DOI
  30. Perez R.,, 1984, Culture expérimentale de l'algue Undaria pinnatifida sur les côtes de France, Science et Pêche, 343, 3
  31. Perez R. R.Kaas F.Campello S.Arbault andO.Barbaroux.1992. La culture de l'algueUndaria pinnatifida(Harvey) Suringar. Pages 425–462inLa culture des algues marines dans le monde. Service de la Documentation et des Publications (SDP) IFREMER Plouzane France.
  32. Pérez‐Cirera J. L.,, 1997, Cultivo de Undaria pinnatifida (Laminariales, Phaeophyta) en Galicia, Nova Acta Científica Compostelana (Bioloxía), 7, 3
  33. Pérez‐Villar V. M.Gómez‐Gesteira andV.Pérez‐Muñuzuri.2000. Modelización informática. Pages 41–46inOrdenación integral del espacio marítimo‐terrestre de Galicia. Fundación Empresa‐Universidad Galega Santiago de Compostela Spain.
  34. 10.1007/s00343-009-0054-7 · DOI
  35. 10.1134/S1063074011040110 · DOI
  36. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2011.02.009 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10811-012-9788-2 · DOI
  38. 10.1007/BF02182511 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0304-3770(92)90002-Z · DOI
  40. 10.1017/S0025315408001495 · DOI
  41. 10.3354/meps013303 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/s00227-005-1571-3 · DOI
  43. 10.1515/BOT.2006.039 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/BF02365430 · DOI
  45. 10.1007/BF02803129 · DOI
  46. 10.1023/A:1002914015683 · DOI
  47. 10.1669/0883-1351(2002)017<0522:ANTFMO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s00442-002-0944-2 · DOI
  49. 10.1134/S1063074010040012 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1016/0044-8486(92)90227-C · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s10811-006-9062-6 · DOI
  52. 10.1007/s10811-007-9299-8 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/0044-8486(93)90475-E · DOI
  54. 10.1016/0025-326X(95)00100-2 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/BF00004026 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peteiro, C., & Freire, Ó.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Español de Oceanografía (ES)
  • Universidade da Coruña (ES)
Venue
Journal of the World Aquaculture Society
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-10
Volume
44
Issue
5
Pages
706-715
ISSN
  • 0893-8849 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-7345
OpenAlex
W2139727673
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the World Aquaculture Society (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia (AGL2002-01285)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
Keywords
epiphytism, Undaria pinnatifida, Saccharina latissima, epiphyte abundance, Obelia geniculata, Harpacticoida, hydroids, Crustacea, epiphyte biomass, Galicia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review