Blackley and the development of hay fever as a disease of civilization in the nineteenth century
Open accessAbstract
Recent surveys have estimated that the prevalence of hay fever among modem populations is between 2 and 15 per cent.1 Yet there are few references to the condition in any literature before the nineteenth century.Despite this fact, by 1900 hay fever was described as a common and fashionable disease.In this paper I outline the first descriptions of hay fever and how ideas about it developed through the nineteenth century.I then examine in some detail how thoughts about hay fever progressed so that it came to be described as a disease of civilization.Early References to Hay Fever It is claimed that the first known hay fever sufferer may have been Hippias the Athenian traitor who guided the Persian fleet to its landing at Marathon and finally commanded part of the army in the subsequent battle.2Rosen concludes from his researches that there are numerous allusions in the Bible and Talmud which point to the presence of nasal allergy and hay fever.However these claims are somewhat tenuous.A more concrete description is given by Rhazes in a Arabic text entitled 'On the reasons why the heads of people swell at the time of roses and produce catarrh'.3References to aversions to roses are documented from the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries and have already been well described by Wood, Mackenzie and Emanuel.4Many of the early authors on the subject of hay fever were themselves sufferers.There are other accounts of rose fever during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, and it appears likely from the symptoms given that this ailment was what we term hay fever.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
During the 1870s, Blackley found no hay fever among farmers and people living in deprived areas of cities.
“During the 1870s, Blackley found no hay fever among farmers and people living in deprived areas of cities.606”
From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [606]
In “Hay Fever’s Social Status,” Waite reports that Blackley found no hay-fever symptoms among the “farming classes.” The same passage attributes the negative inquiries in deprived city areas to Beard, not Blackley. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn 1829, John Bostock described 29 cases in the UK, including himself, of catarrhus aestivus or "summer cold," which he noted occurred in patients of middle to high socioeconomic status.
“In 1829, John Bostock described 29 cases in the UK, including himself, of individuals who suffered from catarrhus aestivus or “summer cold,” which he noted occurred in patients of middle to high SES.606”
From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [606]
In the passage labeled Abstract (page unavailable), Waite says Bostock published his own case in 1819 and described 28 more cases in 1829, calling the condition “catarrhus aestivus” and associating it with the middle or upper classes. That supports 29 cases cumulatively, including his own, but not the claim that he described all 29 in 1829. The passage does not specify that all 29 cases were in the UK. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Hay fever, a post industrial revolution epidemic: a history of its growth during the 19th century
Emanuel, M. B. (1988) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1988.tb02872.x · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Epidemiology of allergic rhinitis.
Sibbald, B. (1993) · PubMed · Cited by 91 · see citing works
The place of George M. BEARD in nineteenth-century psychiatry.
Rosenberg, C. (1998) · PubMed · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Charles Harrison Blackley, 1820–1900
Taylor, G., & WALKER, J. (1973) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1973.tb01314.x · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Incidence of allergic rhinitis in general practice, 1981-92
Ross, A. M., & Fleming, D. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6933.897 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
John Bostock, hay fever, and the mechanism of allergy
Finn, D. J. (1992) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(92)92634-r · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Review of Hay Fever. 1. Historical Background and Mechanisms
WOOD, S. F. (1986) · Family Practice · doi:10.1093/fampra/3.1.54 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Nasal allergy in biblical and talmudic times.
Rosen, Z. S. (1971) · PubMed · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Anon. 'Obituary', Mon. homoepathic Rev., p. 107. 1900, 44: 634-7, p. 634.
- C H Blackley, 'On the influence of infinitesimal 29 W J Elwood, and A F Tuxford (eds), Some quantities in inducing physiological action', Mon. Manchester doctors: a biographical collection to homoeopathic Rev., 1882, 26: 604-18. mark the 150th anniversary of the Manchester 34 Anon., op. cit., note 27 above, p. 635. Medical Society 1834-1984, Manchester University 35 Idem, Experimental researches on the cause Press, 1984, p. 191. and nature of catarrhus aestivus (hay-fever or hay- 30 F Bosdin Leech, 'Charles Harrison Blackley of asthma), London, Balliere, Tindall and Cox, 1873, Manchester and hay fever', Br med. J., 1929, ii: p. 34. 1171-2, p. 1171.
- neurasthenia', J. Hist. Med., 1977, 32: 33-54.
- J Oppenheim, "Shattered nerves": doctors, 54 W P Dunbar, 'Etiology and specific therapy of patients and depression in Victorian England, hay fever', Ann. Allergy, 1962, 20: 752-64. Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 104.
- E J Marsh, 'Hay fever or pollen poisoning', reprinted in Ann. Allergy., 1962, 20: 45-57, p. 52. 73 Cook, op. cit., note 11 above, p. 483. history of medicine, London and New York, 74
Cited by
Sorted by citations
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis
Wise, S. K., Lin, S. Y., Toskala, E., Orlandi, R. R., Akdis, C. A., Alt, J. A., Azar, A., Baroody, F. M., Bachert, C., Canonica, G. W., et al. (2018) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.22073 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
- Authors
- Waite, K. J.
- Affiliations
- The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Waite, Kathryn J
- Venue
- Medical History
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 186-196
- ISSN
- 0025-7273 (ISSN-L)
- 2048-8343
- PMC
- PMC1036974
- OpenAlex
- W2108032259
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical History (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Medical History and Innovations
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- allergic rhinitis, history of medicine, 19th century, allergy history
- MeSH terms
- Civilization, Europe, Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal, Humans, United States, History, 19th Century
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review