Cited by 1Probiotics and Fermented FoodsClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyInfant Nutrition and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Safety of probiotics in patients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition: a systematic review of trials and case reports

Open access
Whelan, K., Myers, C.·2009·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0029665109001451

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LBPs based on Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are safe for patients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition.

    “In general, LBPs based on Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are safe for patients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition [76].”

    From Current Concepts in Probiotic Safety and Efficacy (2026) · cites this paper as [76]

    The review’s concluding passage says lactobacilli and bifidobacteria probiotics generally *appear* safe in patients receiving enteral or parenteral nutrition. The citing sentence presents safety more definitively and omits the review’s cautions for several higher-risk patient groups and delivery conditions. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Whelan, K., & Myers, C.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2009
Volume
68
Issue
OCE1
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W2124298804
Cited by
1
References
3
FWCI
0.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic safety, enteral nutrition, parenteral nutrition, critically ill patients, adverse events

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review