Cited by 47Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthInfant Health and Development

Challenges of the low FODMAP diet for managing irritable bowel syndrome and approaches to their minimisation and mitigation

Open access
Wilson, Bridgette, Cox, Selina R., Whelan, Kevin·2021·Proceedings of the Nutrition Society

Abstract

Dietary restriction of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) is clinically effective and a commonly utilised approach in the management of functional symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome. Despite this, the low FODMAP diet has a number of challenges: it can alter the gut microbiota; impact nutrient intake and diet quality; is complex to understand; requires the patient to be adequately supported to follow the diet accurately and safely; and lastly, not all patients respond to the diet. The current review highlights the evidence for the clinical effectiveness of the low FODMAP diet, but focusses on the challenges associated with the diet to the patient, health professionals and the wider healthcare service. Finally, the review discusses research findings and practical guidance for how these challenges can be minimised and mitigated. The low FODMAP diet is a useful management strategy for irritable bowel syndrome, with data from clinical trials suggesting a 50–80% response rate, and when administered appropriately, the challenges to implementing the diet can be overcome so that these outcomes can be realised effectively and safely in clinical practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0029665120006990

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Issues with following a low FODMAP diet, as opposed to traditional dietary advice, include the need for a specialist dietitian to implement it, followed by close monitoring to avoid nutritional deficiencies or the development of overly restrictive eating habits.

    “Issues with following a low FODMAP diet, as opposed to traditional dietary advice, include the need for a specialist dietitian to implement it, followed by close monitoring to avoid nutritional deficiencies or the development of overly restrictive eating habits.[207][208][209]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, B., Cox, S. R., & Whelan, K.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Whelan, Kevin
Venue
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
Published
2020-05-29
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
19-28
ISSN
  • 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-2719
OpenAlex
W3032358717
Cited by
47
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kenneth Rainin Foundation (KRA000047)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
low FODMAP diet, irritable bowel syndrome, dietary restriction, gut microbiota, nutrient intake, diet quality, patient support, dietary adherence, treatment response, functional gastrointestinal symptoms, clinical practice implementation
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Disaccharides, Eating, Fermentation, Humans, Monosaccharides, Oligosaccharides, Patient Compliance, Polymers, Treatment Outcome, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review