The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social determinants of food choice
Open accessAbstract
Food choice is influenced by a large number of factors, including social and cultural factors. One method for trying to understand the impact of these factors is through the study of attitudes. Research is described which utilizes social psychological attitude models of attitude-behaviour relationships, in particular the Theory of Planned Behaviour. This approach has shown good prediction of behaviour, but there are a number of possible extensions to this basic model which might improve its utility. One such extension is the inclusion of measures of moral concern, which have been found to be important both for the choice of genetically-modified foods and also for foods to be eaten by others. It has been found to be difficult to effect dietary change, and there are a number of insights from social psychology which might address this difficulty. One is the phenomenon of optimistic bias, where individuals believe themselves to be at less risk from various hazards than the average person. This effect has been demonstrated for nutritional risks, and this might lead individuals to take less note of health education messages. Another concern is that individuals do not always have clear-cut attitudes, but rather can be ambivalent about food and about healthy eating. It is important, therefore, to have measures for this ambivalence, and an understanding of how it might impact on behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior
Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843 · Cited by 1,024
Cited by
van Harreveld, F., Nohlen, H. U., & Schneider, I. K. (2015) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2015.01.002 · Cited by 183
Johansen, S. B., Næs, T., & Hersleth, M. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2010.11.137 · Cited by 111
Importance of intrinsic and extrinsic quality food characteristics by different consumer segments
Brečić, R., Mesić, Ž., & Cerjak, M. (2017) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-06-2016-0284 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- Shepherd, R.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the Nutrition Society
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 807-812
- ISSN
- 0029-6651 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2719
- OpenAlex
- W2076902208
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social determinants of food choice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0029665199001093
- The paper
- Shepherd, R. (1999). Social determinants of food choice. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0029665199001093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.