Cited by 1,024Behavioral Health and InterventionsObesity and Health PracticesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior

Schifter, Deborah E., Ajzen, Icek·1985·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Success at attempted weight reduction among college women was predicted on the basis of a theory of planned behavior. At the beginning of a 6-week period, participants expressed their attitudes, subjective norms, perceived control, and intentions with respect to losing weight. In addition, the extent to which they had made detailed weight reduction plans was assessed, as were a number of general attitudes and personality factors. In support of the theory, intentions to lose weight were accurately predicted on the basis of attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived control; perceived control and intentions were together moderately successful in predicting the amount of weight that participants actually lost over the 6-week period. Actual weight loss was also found to increase with development of a plan and with ego strength, factors that were assumed to increase control over goal attainment. Other factors, such as health locus of control, perceived competence, and action control, were found to be unrelated to weight reduction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only one of these studies obtained a marginally significant (p < .10) linear x linear interaction between intentions to lose weight and perceptions of control over this behavioral goal.

    “Of these studies, only one (Schifter & Ajzen, 1985) obtained a marginally significant (p < .lO)linear x linear interaction between intentions to lose weight and perceptions of control over this behavioral goal.”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Schifter & Ajzen, 1985

  • In most of the remaining Table 1 studies, intentions proved more important than perceived behavioral control; only for weight loss did perceived behavioral control overshadow intention.

    “In most of the remaining studies, intentions proved the more important of the two predictors; only in the case of weight loss (Netemeyer, Burton, & Johnston, 1990;Schifter & Ajzen, 1985) did perceived behavioral control overshadow the contribution of intention.”

    From The theory of planned behavior (1991) · cites this paper as Schifter & Ajzen, 1985

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1985
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
843-851
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2059637860
Cited by
1,024
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 30
FWCI
6.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
weight loss, theory of planned behavior, female university students, perceived control, intention, attitudes, subjective norms, ego strength, health locus of control, perceived competence, action control, goal achievement
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Weight, Diet, Reducing, Ego, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Obesity, Set, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review