Ecological and financial impacts of illegal bushmeat trade in Zimbabwe
Open accessAbstract
Under conditions of political instability and economic decline illegal bushmeat hunting has emerged as a serious conservation threat in Zimbabwe. Following settlement of game ranches by subsistence farming communities, wildlife populations have been eradicated over large areas. In several areas still being managed as game ranches illegal hunting is causing further declines of wildlife populations (including threatened species such as the wild dog Lycaon pictus and black rhinoceros Diceros bicornis ), threatening the viability of wildlife-based land uses. From August 2001 to July 2009 in Savé Valley Conservancy 10,520 illegal hunting incidents were recorded, 84,396 wire snares removed, 4,148 hunters caught, 2,126 hunting dogs eliminated and at least 6,454 wild animals killed. Estimated future financial losses from illegal hunting in the Conservancy exceed USD 1.1 million year -1 . Illegal hunters’ earnings account for 0.31–0.52% of the financial losses that they impose and the bushmeat trade is an inefficient use of wildlife resources. Illegal hunting peaks during the late dry season and is more frequent close to the boundary, near areas resettled during land reform and close to water. Illegal hunting with dogs peaks during moonlight periods. Our study highlights several management and land-use planning steps required to maximize the efficacy of anti-poaching and to reduce the likelihood of high impacts of illegal hunting. Anti-poaching efforts should be aligned with the regular temporal and spatial patterns of illegal hunting. Leases for hunting and tourism concessions should ensure minimum adequate investment by operators in anti-poaching. Reserve designers should minimize the surface area to volume ratio of parks. Fences should not be constructed using wire that can be made into snares. Land reform involving game ranches should integrate communities in wildlife-based land uses and ensure spatial separation between land for wildlife and human settlement. Means are required to create stake-holdings for communities in wildlife and disincentives for illegal hunting.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Poaching rates in SVC increased to extremely high levels after the FTLRP began; between August 2001 and June 2009 over 84,000 snares were removed and 4,148 poachers were captured.
“Poaching rates in SVC increased to extremely high levels after the FTLRP began; between August 2001 and June 2009 over 84,000 snares were removed and 4,148 poachers were captured (Lindsey et al., 2011b).”
From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Lindsey et al., 2011b
Within the private LUT, rates of poaching per unit area were over 2.5 times higher in the south than the north, which is probably linked to greater proximity to the resettlement area.
“Within the private LUT, rates of poaching per unit area were over 2.5 times higher in the south than the north (Lindsey et al., 2011b), which is probably linked to greater proximity to the resettlement area (Fig. 1).”
From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Lindsey et al., 2011b
A more likely explanation is population declines precipitated by extensive bushmeat poaching.
“A more likely explanation is population declines precipitated by extensive bushmeat poaching (Lindsey et al., 2011b).”
From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Lindsey et al., 2011b
Land resettlement was widespread in Zimbabwe, and most of the other large-scale conservancies including Gwayi, Bubiana and Chiredzi River have also been severely affected by the FTLRP, with very few (such as Malilangwe Trust) remaining untouched.
“Land resettlement was widespread in Zimbabwe, however, and most of the other large-scale conservancies including Gwayi, Bubiana and Chiredzi River have also been severely affected by the FTLRP (du Toit, 2004; Lindsey et al., 2011b), with very few (such as Malilangwe Trust) remaining untouched (Lindsey et al., 2011b).”
From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Lindsey et al., 2011b
The remains of 6,454 poached animals were recovered, including 2 cheetahs, 5 leopards and, 27 wild dogs.
“The remains of 6,454 poached animals were recovered, including 2 cheetahs, 5 leopards and, 27 wild dogs (Lindsey et al., 2011b).”
From The impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe (2016) · cites this paper as Lindsey et al., 2011b
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lindsey, P. A., Nyirenda, V. R., Barnes, J. I., Becker, M. S., McRobb, R., Tambling, C. J., Taylor, W. A., Watson, F. G., & t’Sas-Rolfes, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0094109 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
Self-citationLindsey, P. A., Barnes, J., Nyirenda, V., Pumfrett, B., Tambling, C. J., Taylor, W. A., & Rolfes, M. T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081761 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationThe impact of land reform on the status of large carnivores in Zimbabwe
Williams, S. T., Williams, K. S., Joubert, C. J., & Hill, R. A. (2016) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.1537 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“5 times higher in the south than the north (Lindsey et al., 2011b), which is probably linked to greater proximity to the resettlement area (Fig.”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Lindsey, P. A., Romañach, S. S., Tambling, C. J., Chartier, K., & Groom, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Nelson Mandela University (ZA)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lindsey, P.A.
- Venue
- Oryx
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 96-111
- ISSN
- 0030-6053 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3008
- OpenAlex
- W2104510056
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Oryx (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Nelson Mandela University Research Repository (submittedVersion)
- UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Keywords
- poaching, game ranches, land reform, anti-poaching, hunting dogs, wildlife tourism, land use planning, reserve design, community-based wildlife management, Zimbabwe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review