Cited by 41Wildlife Ecology and ConservationConservation, Biodiversity, and Resource ManagementWildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

The impact of civil war on forest wildlife in West Africa: mammals in Gola Forest, Sierra Leone

Open access
Lindsell, Jeremy A., Klop, Erik, Siaka, Alhaji M.·2011·Oryx

Abstract

Human conflicts may sometimes benefit wildlife by depopulating wilderness areas but there is evidence from Africa that the impacts tend to be negative. The forested states of West Africa have experienced much recent human conflict but there have been no assessments of impacts on the wildlife. We conducted surveys of mammals in the 710-km 2 Gola Forest reserves to assess the impact of the 1991–2001 civil war in Sierra Leone. Gola is the most important remaining tract of lowland forest in the country and a key site for the conservation of the highly threatened forests of the Upper Guinea region. We found that Gola has survived well despite being in the heart of the area occupied by the rebels. We recorded 44 species of larger mammal, including 18 threatened, near-threatened and endemic species, accounting for all species recorded in pre-war surveys and adding several more (African buffalo Syncerus caffer nanus and water chevrotain Hyemoschus aquaticus). Populations of primates were healthy with little evidence of decline. Duiker detection rates were low and further work is required to confirm their numbers as they include five species endemic (or near endemic) to the Upper Guinea region, three of which are threatened. However, the population of African forest elephants Loxodonta cyclotis has collapsed, with only a few individuals remaining from c. 110 in the mid 1980s. We conclude that peacetime pressures from the bushmeat trade, clearance for agriculture, logging and mining are likely to be far greater for Gola than the pressures from the civil war.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0030605310000347

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current estimate for Sierra Leone is roughly 150 C. liberiensis individuals countrywide, primarily within the Gola Forest complex.

    “Data from recent field surveys were not sufficient to determine actual abundance (Conway 2013); the current estimate for Sierra Leone is roughly 150 individuals countrywide, primarily within the Gola Forest complex, including the Moa River islands (Lindsell et al. 2011;Mallon et al. 2011).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Lindsell et al. 2011

    The Results (page not provided) document pygmy hippopotamuses in the Gola area and on Tiwai Island in the Moa River. The Discussion (page not provided) suggests several tens of animals in and around the reserves, but does not give a countrywide estimate of roughly 150 or establish that most of Sierra Leone’s population is there. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Further threats to C. liberiensis include lack of adequate financial and legal protection for the few remaining intact areas of habitat, poaching for bushmeat, and increasing human settlement adjacent to protected areas.

    “Further threats include lack of adequate financial and legal protection for the few remaining intact areas of habitat, poaching for bushmeat, and increasing human settlement adjacent to protected areas (Anstey 1991b;Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund 2015;Lindsell et al. 2011;Ransom et al. 2015).”

    From Choeropsis liberiensis (Artiodactyla: Hippopotamidae) (2019) · cites this paper as Lindsell et al. 2011

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says that 63% of riverine forest in the Gola area lies outside the reserves, so pygmy hippopotamuses may not be well protected. It also identifies an increasing human population and demand for bushmeat as threats to the forest. It does not establish inadequate financial or legal protection, or identify poaching and settlement adjacent to protected areas as specific threats to C. liberiensis. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. A L L P O R T , G., A U S D E N , M., H A Y M A N , P.V., R O B E R T S O N , P. & W O O D , P. (1989) The Conservation of the Birds in Gola Forest, Sierra Leone. ICBP Study Report. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  2. B U C K L A N D , S.T., A N D E R S O N , D.R., B U R N H A M , K.P., L A A K E , J.L., B O R C H E R , D.L. & T H O M A S , L. (2001) Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
  3. B U C K L A N D , S.T., A N D E R S O N , D.R., B U R N H A M , K.P., L A A K E , J.L., B O R C H E R S , D.L. & T H O M A S , L. (2004) Advanced Distance Sampling. Oxford University Press, London, UK.
  4. C O L L A R , N.J. & S T U A R T , S.N. (1988) Key Forests for Threatened Birds in Africa. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, UK.
  5. D A V I E S , G., S C H U L T E -HERBRU ¨G G E N , B., K U ¨M P E L , N.F. & M E N D E L S O N , S. (2007) Hunting and trapping in Gola forests, south-eastern Sierra Leone: bushmeat from farm, fallow and forest. In Bushmeat and Livelihoods: Wildlife Management and Poverty Reduction (eds A.G. Davies & D. Brown), pp. 15-31. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
  6. D E F L E R , T.R. & P I N T O R , D. (1985) Censusing primates by transect in a forest of known primate density. International Journal of Primatology, 6, 243-259.
  7. F I S H P O O L , L.D. & E V A N S , M.I. (2001) Important Bird Areas in Africa and Associated Islands: Priority Sites for Conservation. BirdLife International and Pisces Publications, Cambridge/ Newbury, UK.
  8. G A N A S , J. & LINDSELL, J.A. (2010) Photographic evidence of Jentink's duiker in the Gola Forest Reserves, Sierra Leone. African Journal of Ecology, 48, 566-568.
  9. G R U B B , P., J O N E S , T.S., D A V I E S , A.G., E D B E R G , E., S T A R I N , E.D. & H I L L , J.E. (1998) The Mammals of Ghana, Sierra Leone and the Gambia. The Tendrine Press, St Ives, UK.
  10. M I T T E R M E I E R , R.A., R O B L E S G I L , P., H O F F M A N N , M., P I L G R I M , J., B R O O K S , T., G O E T T S C H M I T T E R M E I E R , C. et al. (2004) Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA.
  11. N E W I N G , H.S. (1994) Behavioural ecology of duikers (Cephalophus spp.) in forest and secondary growth, Taı ¨, Co ˆte d'Ivoire. PhD thesis. Stirling University, Stirling, UK.
  12. R I C H A R D S , P. (2005) War as smoke and mirrors: Sierra Leone 1991-2, 1994-5, 1995-6. Anthropological Quarterly, 78, 377-402.
  13. S T A T T E R S F I E L D , A.J., C R O S B Y , M.J., L O N G , A.J. & W E G E , D.C. (1998) Endemic Bird Areas of the World: Priorities for Biodiversity Conservation. BirdLife International, Cambridge, UK.
  14. T H O M A S , L., B U C K L A N D , S.T., R E X S T A D , E.A., L A A K E , J.L., S T R I N D B E R G , S., H E D L E Y , S.L. et al. (2010) Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47, 5-14.
  15. W H I T E S I D E S , G.H., O A T E S , J.F., G R E E N , S.M. & K L U B E R D A N Z , R.P. (1988) Estimating primate densities from transects in a West African rain forest: a comparison of techniques. Journal of Animal Ecology, 57, 345-367.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindsell, J. A., Klop, E., & Siaka, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (GB)
  • Kulite (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Lindsell, Jeremy A.
Venue
Oryx
Published
2011-01
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
69-77
ISSN
  • 0030-6053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3008
OpenAlex
W2137552340
Cited by
41
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Oryx (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses
Keywords
forest mammals, Sierra Leone civil war, African forest elephant, Loxodonta cyclotis, duikers, primates, bushmeat trade, threatened species, forest conservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review