The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts
Abstract
Infection with the endosymbiotic bacteria Wolbachia is widespread in filarial nematodes. Previous studies have suggested concordance between the phylogeny of Wolbachia with that of their nematode hosts. However, there is only one published molecular phylogenetic study of filarial species, based on the 5S rRNA gene spacer. The phylogeny proposed by this study is partially incongruent with previous classifications of filarial nematodes, based on morphological characters. Furthermore, both traditional classifications and molecular phylogenies are, in part, inconsistent with the phylogeny of Wolbachia. Here we report mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene sequences for 11 species of filaria and for another spirurid nematode which was included as an outgroup. In addition, 16S rRNA, wsp and ftsZ gene sequences were generated for the Wolbachia of several filarial species, in order to complete the available data sets and further resolve the phylogeny of Wolbachia in nematodes. We used these data to evaluate whether nematode and Wolbachia phylogenies are concordant. Some of the possible phylogenetic reconstructions based on COI gene were congruent with the phylogeny of Wolbachia and supported the grouping of the rodent filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis with the lymphatic filariae (i.e. Brugia spp. and Wuchereria spp.) and the sister group relationship of Dirofilaria spp. and Onchocerca spp. However, the placement of the Wolbachia-free filaria Acanthocheilonema viteae is ambiguous and dependent on the phylogenetic methods used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
Kishino, H., & Hasegawa, M. (1989) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf02100115 · Cited by 3,373
Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods will be Positively Misleading
Felsenstein, J. (1978) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401 · Cited by 2,896
Quartet Puzzling: A Quartet Maximum-Likelihood Method for Reconstructing Tree Topologies
Strimmer, K., & von Haeseler, A. (1996) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025664 · Cited by 2,531
Nematode parasites of vertebrates: their development and transmission
Anderson, R. C. (2000) · CABI Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1079/9780851994215.0000 · Cited by 2,486
Van de Peer, Y., & De Wachter, R. (1994) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/10.5.569 · Cited by 2,257
PHYLOGENIES FROM MOLECULAR SEQUENCES: INFERENCE AND RELIABILITY
Felsenstein, J. (1988) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ge.22.120188.002513 · Cited by 2,128
Werren, J. H. (1997) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.42.1.587 · Cited by 1,570
Phylogeny and PCR–based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences
Zhou, W., Rousset, F., & O'Neill, S. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1998.0324 · Cited by 1,318
A Successive Approximations Approach to Character Weighting
Farris, J. S. (1969) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412182 · Cited by 1,249
Cited by
Human and animal dirofilariasis: The emergence of a zoonotic mosaic
Simón, F., Siles-Lucas, M., Morchón, R., González-Miguel, J., Mellado, I., Carretón, E., & Montoya-Alonso, J. A. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00012-12 · Cited by 834
Wolbachia.Bacterial Endosymbionts of Filarial Nematodes
Taylor, M. J., Bandi, C., & Hoerauf, A. (2005) · Advances in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/s0065-308x(05)60004-8 · Cited by 425
Self-citationFerri, E., Barbuto, M., Bain, O., Galimberti, A., Uni, S., Guerrero, R., Ferté, H., Bandi, C., Martin, C., & Casiraghi, M. (2009) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-6-1 · Cited by 324
Self-citationTaylor, M. D., LeGoff, L., Harris, A., Malone, E., Allen, J. E., & Maizels, R. M. (2005) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4924 · Cited by 294
Kronefeld, M., Kampen, H., Sassnau, R., & Werner, D. (2014) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/1756-3305-7-30 · Cited by 107
Metadata
- Authors
- CASIRAGHI, M., ANDERSON, T. J. C., BANDI, C., BAZZOCCHI, C., & GENCHI, C.
- Venue
- Parasitology
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 93-103
- ISSN
- 0031-1820 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8161
- OpenAlex
- W2140892342
- Cited by
- 508
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0031182000007149
- The paper
- CASIRAGHI, M., ANDERSON, T. J. C., BANDI, C., BAZZOCCHI, C., & GENCHI, C. (2001). A phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182000007149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.