The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chest pain with normal coronary arteries: a comparative study of psychiatric and social morbidity
Abstract
Synopsis: Ninety-nine patients with chest pain and a presumptive diagnosis of coronary heart disease were assessed blindly within 24 hours of angiography, using standardized psychiatric and social interviews and a personality inventory. Thirty-one patients had normal coronary arteries (NCA), 15 had slight disease and 53 had significant coronary obstruction. Twenty-eight (61%) of the 46 patients with insignificant disease and 12 (23%) of the 53 with significant obstruction had psychiatric morbidity. Associations between the overall severity of psychiatric morbidity and measures of social maladjustment were strongest in the patients with normal coronary arteries. The 26 men with insignificant coronary artery disease had higher scores of neuroticism and extraversion than the 41 with important coronary occlusions. No differences were observed when the same comparisons were made for the women. The findings indicate that approximately two thirds of patients with normal and near-normal coronary arteries have predominantly psychiatric rather than cardiac disorders: the symptoms in these patients are more likely to represent the somatic manifestations of anxiety and overbreathing than the consequences of underlying cardiac disease. Physicians should be aware of the ways in which neurotic illness may present with symptoms mimicking cardiac disease, especially when cardiovascular symptoms are accompanied by phobic symptoms and unexplained shortness of breath.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuroticism, Somatic Complaints, and Disease: Is the Bark Worse than the Bite?
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1987) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1987.tb00438.x · Cited by 1,010
Psychiatric Disorder in the General Hospital
Mayou, R., & Hawton, K. (1986) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.149.2.172 · Cited by 332
Personality and Health: Advantages and Limitations of the Five‐Factor Model
Smith, T. W., & Williams, P. G. (1992) · Journal of Personality · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00978.x · Cited by 287
Chest pain: Relationship of psychiatric illness to coronary arteriographic results
Katon, W., Hall, M. L., Russo, J., Cormier, L., Hollifield, M., Vitaliano, P. P., & Beitman, B. D. (1988) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(88)90001-0 · Cited by 275
A controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for non-cardiac chest pain
MAYOU, R. A., BRYANT, B. M., SANDERS, D., BASS, C., KLIMES, I., & FORFAR, C. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291797005254 · Cited by 179
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bass, C., & Wade, C.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1984-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-61
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2069821735
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chest pain with normal coronary arteries: a comparative study of psychiatric and social morbidity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s003329170000307x
- The paper
- Bass, C., & Wade, C. (1984). Chest pain with normal coronary arteries: a comparative study of psychiatric and social morbidity. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329170000307x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.