Cited by 180Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsCardiac Health and Mental HealthAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for non-cardiac chest pain

MAYOU, R. A., BRYANT, B. M., SANDERS, D., BASS, C., KLIMES, I., FORFAR, C.·1997·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients presenting to cardiac clinics with chest pain who are reassured they do not have heart disease or other serious physical disorder continue to experience symptoms, worry about heart disease and restrict their activities. This randomized trial investigated the effectiveness of psychological treatment within routine cardiac care. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with chest pain and reassured by a cardiologist they do not have heart disease were reassessed 6 weeks later. Those with persistent limiting symptoms were offered the opportunity to participate in a trial of cognitive behavioural therapy. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects agreed to take part. A number of subjects were unenthusiastic about psychological intervention or, following explanation of the study, regarded further treatment as not being necessary. At 3 months there were significant differences between the treatment group and the control group on key outcome measures of symptoms, mood and activity. At 6 months there were fewer differences but significant advantages of treatment in terms of limitation of activities and worry about physical symptoms. CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is a need for 'stepped' further care following reassurance in the cardiac clinic and that cognitive behavioural treatment is effective with those with persistent disabling symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291797005254

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Patients with excessive health anxiety attend emergency departments frequently, but very few have any significant medical pathology.

    “patients with excessive health anxiety set a very low bar for such a call and also attend emergency departments frequently, but very few have any significant medical pathology.20,21”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MAYOU, R. A., BRYANT, B. M., SANDERS, D., BASS, C., KLIMES, I., & FORFAR, C.
Affiliations
  • Warneford Hospital (GB)
  • John Radcliffe Hospital (GB)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1997-09
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
1021-1031
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2065507730
Cited by
179
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, non-cardiac chest pain, psychological intervention, activity limitation, mood, stepped care
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attitude to Health, Chest Pain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Severity of Illness Index, Somatoform Disorders, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Chi-Square Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review