Cited by 167Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Cognitive impairment in long-term benzodiazepine users

Golombok, Susan, Moodley, Parimala, Lader, Malcolm·1988·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

In view of the very extensive and often prolonged use of benzodiazepines in therapeutic practice, this study was designed to investigate whether or not cognitive ability is impaired in long-term benzodiazepine users, and to determine the nature and extent of any deficit. Fifty patients currently taking benzodiazepines for at least one year, thirty-four who had stopped taking benzodiazepines, and a matched control group of subjects who had never taken benzodiazepines or who had taken benzodiazepines in the past for less than one year were administered a battery of neuropsychological tests designed to measure a wide range of cognitive functions. It was found that patients taking high doses of benzodiazepines for long periods of time perform poorly on tasks involving visual-spatial ability and sustained attention. This is consistent with deficits in posterior cortical cognitive function.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291700007911

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The most common indications for benzodiazepine use in the retrieved studies were insomnia, generalized anxiety disorder, and anxiety with or without panic attacks.

    “The most common indications for benzodiazepine use in these studies were insomnia [30,36,40,55,59,67], generalized anxiety disorder [32,34,45,50,54,65,68], and anxiety with or without panic attacks [30,36,48,54,59,65]”
  • The population of benzodiazepine patients in the retrieved studies is diagnostically heterogeneous.

    “The population of benzodiazepine patients has been described as a “diagnostically heterogenous group,” which aligns with these results [30,36,40,55,59,65,67].”
  • In Golombok 1988, those taking high doses of benzodiazepines over long periods performed worse on neuropsychological tests and had worse visual-spatial ability and attention spans compared to those not taking benzodiazepines.

    “Those taking high doses of BZD over long periods of time performed worse on neuropsychological tests and had worse visual-spatial ability and attention spans compared to those not taking BZD”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Golombok, S., Moodley, P., & Lader, M.
Corresponding author
Golombok, Susan
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1988-05
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pages
365-374
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2071780117
Cited by
167
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
benzodiazepines, long-term drug use, cognitive impairment, visuospatial ability, sustained attention, benzodiazepine withdrawal, neuropsychological deficits
MeSH terms
Antidepressive Agents, Benzodiazepines, Cognition Disorders, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Long-Term Care, Neuropsychological Tests, Substance Withdrawal Syndrome, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review