The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neuropsychological deficits and CT scan changes in elderly depressives
Abstract
Synopsis: A number of computerized tests were used to study visual attention, memory and learning in elderly depressed patients. Impairment was found in approximately 70% of depressed patients and was seen particularly in memory and in measures of latency. Depressed patients showed equivalent impairment in short-term memory but less impairment in conditional associative learning compared to a group of patients with early dementia of the Alzheimer-type (DAT), matched for age and pre-morbid IQ. With respect to qualitative differences between depression and DAT, depressed patients showed a different pattern of errors and a consistently prolonged latency of response which was independent of delay in a delayed matching-to-sample test. On recovery from depression, although improvement was seen in most test scores, performance in measures of latency and in a number of tests of memory and learning failed to reach the level seen in a group of matched control subjects and approximately 35% of patients continued to show impairment. For the depressed patients, ventricular brain ratio (VBR) correlated with measures of slowing. In addition, in the ‘recovered-depressives’, VBR correlated with poor performance at high levels of task difficulty. These findings are discussed with respect to previous literature on the pattern of cognitive impairment and CT scan findings in depression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
Automatic and effortful processes in memory.
Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.108.3.356 · Cited by 2,812
SAHAKIAN, B. J., MORRIS, R. G., EVENDEN, J. L., HEALD, A., LEVY, R., PHILPOT, M., & ROBBINS, T. W. (1988) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/111.3.695 · Cited by 666
Self-citationROGERS, D., LEES, A. J., SMITH, E., TRIMBLE, M., & STERN, G. M. (1987) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/110.3.761 · Cited by 218
Cited by
Cognitive impairment in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rock, P. L., Roiser, J. P., Riedel, W. J., & Blackwell, A. D. (2014) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291713002535 · Cited by 2,161
Cognitive deficits in depression: Possible implications for functional neuropathology
Austin, M.-P., Mitchell, P., & Goodwin, G. M. (2001) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.178.3.200 · Cited by 1,154
The stress system in the human brain in depression and neurodegeneration
Swaab, D. F., Bao, A.-M., & Lucassen, P. J. (2005) · Ageing Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.arr.2005.03.003 · Cited by 984
A meta-analysis of depression severity and cognitive function
McDermott, L. M., & Ebmeier, K. P. (2009) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2009.04.022 · Cited by 956
Depression and memory impairment: A meta-analysis of the association, its pattern, and specificity.
Burt, D. B., Zembar, M. J., & Niederehe, G. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.285 · Cited by 903
Metadata
- Authors
- Abas, M. A., Sahakian, B. J., & Levy, R.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-520
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2004632411
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 11.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuropsychological deficits and CT scan changes in elderly depressives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291700017025
- The paper
- Abas, M. A., Sahakian, B. J., & Levy, R. (1990). Neuropsychological deficits and CT scan changes in elderly depressives. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700017025
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.