CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 116Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchCancer survivorship and careMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The psychological impact of motor neurone disease

Hogg, K. E., Goldstein, L. H., Leigh, P. N.·1994·Psychological Medicine
DOI 10.1017/s003329170002777x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Self-report measures were completed by 59 individuals with motor neurone disease (MND) in order to assess whether: (a) MND affects patients' psychological well-being and quality of life; (b) if greater affective disorder is associated with greater physical disability; (c) whether accepting the illness and ways of coping have an impact on psychological distress, and (d) if beliefs over control of their health shift as the disease progresses. Results indicated that the effects of MND on everyday functioning accounted for incidence of depression and low self-esteem. Acceptance of illness was related to severity of symptoms and was a significant factor irrespective of level of physical symptomatology. Ways of coping with the illness did not relate in any significant way to severity of symptoms. Mild physical impairments were associated with an 'internal' view of control over health.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s003329170002777x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Lazarus, 1984, The Handbook of Behavioural Medicine, 282
  2. 10.1037/0022-006X.52.3.343 · DOI
  3. Lambert V. A. (1981). Factors Affecting Psychological Well-being in Rheumatoid Arthritic Women. Ph.D. thesis, San Francisco School of Nursing: University of California.
  4. 1988, SPSS/PC+

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 116

Related

Metadata

Authors
Hogg, K. E., Goldstein, L. H., & Leigh, P. N.
Corresponding author
Goldstein, L. H.
ORCID
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
1994-08
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
625-632
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
DOI
10.1017/s003329170002777x
OpenAlex
W1987364828
Cited by
116
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 5456 d)
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
motor neuron disease, psychological well-being, quality of life, depression, self-esteem, acceptance of illness, coping, perceived control over health, physical disability, symptom severity, disease progression
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Depression, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Neurologic Examination, Personality Inventory, Quality of Life, Self Concept, Sick Role, Social Environment, Motor Neuron Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review