Cited by 33Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Effects of positive and negative life events on time to depression onset: an analysis of additivity and timing

Frank, E., Tu, X. M., Anderson, B., Reynolds, C. F., Karp, J. F., Mayo, A., Ritenour, A., Kupfer, D. J.·1996·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

While the relationship of life events to depression onset has occupied researchers for almost a quarter of a century, few studies have attempted to account for either the temporal patterning of events relative to episode onset, or, the effect of multiple events in a study period. In this report, we attempt to address the issues of timing of events, multiple events (both positive and negative) and multiple aspects (both positivity and negativity) of single events on latency time to depression onset, while simultaneously accounting for possible decay in the effects of events over time. We use the proportional hazards approach to model the effects of life events and consider modelling the change in impact of events with the passage of time. After interviewing 142 recurrent unipolar patients using the Life Events and Difficulties Schedule, we rated severity and positivity of life events reported during the 6-month period prior to onset. As we hypothesized, additional life events occurring after an initial provoking agent level event significantly alter the risk of illness onset. Additional severely threatening events decrease the time to onset, but positive events do not appear to delay onset. Interestingly, seemingly neutral events had a highly significant effect in shortening the time to onset. We note the many limitations imposed on the interpretation of these findings related to the selected group of subjects studied and encourage those who have more generalizable data to app…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291700035686

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, E., Tu, X. M., Anderson, B., Reynolds, C. F., Karp, J. F., Mayo, A., Ritenour, A., & Kupfer, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Frank, E.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
1996-05
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
613-626
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W1993880188
Cited by
33
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r29ai036627-05)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-43832, MH30915)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI 36627)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
life events, depression onset, major depressive disorder, recurrent depression, event timing, event severity, proportional hazards model
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Personality Inventory, Recurrence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review