The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A prospective study of children with head injures: III. Psychiatric sequelae
Abstract
SYNOPSIS: A 2¼-year prospective study of children suffering head injury is described. Three groups of children were studied: (a) 31 children with ‘severe’ head injuries resulting in a post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) of at least 7 days; (b) an individually matched control group of 28 children with hospital-treated orthopaedic injuries; and (c) 29 children with ‘mild’ head injuries resulting in a PTA exceeding 1 hour but less than 1 week. A retrospective assessment of the children's pre-accident behaviour was obtained by parental interview and teacher questionnaire immediately after the accident and before the behavioural sequelae of the injury could be known. Further psychiatric assessments were undertaken 4 months, 1 year and 21 years after the initial injury. The mild head injury group showed a raised level of behavioural disturbance before the accident but no increase thereafter. It was concluded that head injuries resulting in a PTA of less than I week did not appreciably increase the psychiatric risk. By contrast, there was a marked increase in psychiatric disorders following severe head injury. The high rate of new disorders in children with severe head injuries who were without disorder before the accident, together with the finding of a dose–response relationship with the severity of brain injury, indicated a causal relationship. However, the development of psychiatric disorders in children with severe head injuries was also influenced by the children's pre-accident behaviour, their intellectual level, and their psychosocial circumstances. With the exception of social disinhibition and a slight tendency for the disorders to show greater persistence over time, the disorders attributable to head injury showed no specific features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Autism diagnostic interview: A standardized investigator-based instrument
Le Couteur, A., Rutter, M., Lord, C., Rios, P., Robertson, S., Holdgrafer, M., & McLennan, J. (1989) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02212936 · Cited by 1,036
Self-citationCognitive and Behavioral Outcome Following Mild Traumatic Head Injury in Children
Ponsford, J., Willmott, C., Rothwell, A., Cameron, P., Ayton, G., Nelms, R., Curran, C., & Ng, K. T. (1999) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-199908000-00005 · Cited by 299
Mild head injury in children and adolescents: A review of studies (1970–1995).
Satz, P., Zaucha, K., McCleary, C., Light, R., Asarnow, R., & Becker, D. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.122.2.107 · Cited by 245
Psychiatric problems in children with hemiplegia: cross sectional epidemiological survey
Goodman, R., & Graham, P. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7038.1065 · Cited by 142
DENNIS, M., GUGER, S., RONCADIN, C., BARNES, M., & SCHACHAR, R. (2001) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617701766040 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Brown, G., Chadwick, O., Shaffer, D., Rutter, M., & Traub, M.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1981-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 63-78
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2108112659
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A prospective study of children with head injures: III. Psychiatric sequelae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291700053289
- The paper
- Brown, G., Chadwick, O., Shaffer, D., Rutter, M., & Traub, M. (1981). A prospective study of children with head injures: III. Psychiatric sequelae. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291700053289
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.