Cited by 59Burn Injury Management and OutcomesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDermatologic Treatments and Research

Long-term adjustment in burn victims: a matched-control study

ALTIER, N., MALENFANT, A., FORGET, R., CHOINIÈRE, M.·2002·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, there is little information about how severely burned patients compare to unburned healthy individuals in terms of psychological profile and quality of life. As part of a larger study on the sensory consequences of burns, we assessed psychological functioning and quality of life in burned patients and unburned healthy control subjects. We also examined whether burn patients experiencing pain and/or paresthetic sensations (i.e. symptomatic patients) present a profile that is different from those who are asymptomatic. METHODS: Forty-nine burned patients (% total body surface area = 34 59 % +/- 13.40; 82% males/18% females) were evaluated 63 59 +/- 28.1 months post-burn. They were matched with 49 unburned healthy volunteers on age, sex, and education level. All subjects were administered the Symptom Checklist 90-Revised (SCL-90-R) to assess psychological functioning and the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) to assess quality of life. RESULTS: Approximately 25% of the burn patients presented clinically-significant psychological disturbances compared to 12% in the control group. Burn patients enjoyed a quality of life comparable to that of the control subjects, although they perceived some deterioration in their general health. More symptomatic than asymptomatic patients suffered from clinically-relevant somatization and obsessive-compulsive disturbances. CONCLUSIONS: Severely burned patients adjust relatively well, although some develop clinically-significant psychological disturbances such as somatization and phobic anxiety. Burn patients experiencing abnormal sensations in their healed wounds (i.e. symptomatic patients) do not suffer from maladjustment to a greater extent than their asymptomatic counterparts, although more symptomatic patients experience somatization and obsessive-compulsive behaviours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291702005354

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ALTIER, N., MALENFANT, A., FORGET, R., & CHOINIÈRE, M.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CA)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2002-05
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
677-685
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2024068095
Cited by
59
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Burn Injury Management and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Keywords
burns, quality of life, mental illness, somatization, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, phobic anxiety, paresthesia, pain, matched control comparison
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Burns, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Pain, Paresthesia, Personality Inventory, Psychophysics, Quality of Life, Sick Role, Somatoform Disorders, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review