Guided self-help for bulimia nervosa in primary care: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To increase access to cognitive behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa new delivery modes are being examined. Guided Self-Help (GSH) in primary care is potentially valuable in this respect. This research aimed to compare outcomes following GSH delivered by general practitioners (GPs) in the normal course of their practice to a delayed treatment control (DTC) condition, and to examine the maintenance of treatment gains at 3 and 6 months following completion of GSH. METHOD: Participants were 109 women with full syndrome or sub-threshold bulimia nervosa, randomly allocated to GSH ( n = 54) and DTC ( n = 55). The GSH group received direction and support from a GP over a 17-week period while working through the manual in Bulimia Nervosa and Binge-Eating: A Guide to Recovery by P. J. Cooper (1995). GSH and DTC groups were assessed pre-treatment and 1 week following the 17-week intervention or waiting interval. The GSH group was reassessed at 3- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analyses at end of treatment revealed significant improvements in bulimic and psychological symptoms in GSH compared with DTC, reduction in mean frequency of binge-eating episodes by 60% in GSH and 6% in DTC, and remission from all binge-eating and compensatory behaviours in 28% of the GSH and 11% of the DTC sample. Treatment gains were maintained at 3- and 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: Outcomes in GSH compare favourably with those of specialist-delivered psychological treatments. These findings are considered in light of the nature of the therapy offered and the primary care context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Banasiak et al.'s intention-to-treat analyses revealed significant improvements in psychological symptoms at the end of the intervention compared with control.
“Intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses revealed significant improvements in psychological symptoms at the end of the intervention compared with control”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Banasiak et al. reported a reduction in mean frequency of binge-eating episodes by 60% in the intervention group and 6% in the control group.
“reduction in mean frequency of binge-eating episodes by 60% in intervention and 6% in control”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Interventions targeting eating disorders were evaluated in four RCTs.
“Interventions targeting eating disorders were evaluated in four RCTs”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Banasiak et al.'s treatment gains were maintained at three and six-month follow-up.
“Treatment gains were maintained at three and six-month follow-up”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Banasiak et al. reported remission from all binge-eating and compensatory behaviours in 28% of the intervention group and 11% of the control group.
“remission from all binge-eating and compensatory behaviours in 28% of the intervention and 11% of control”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Psychological functioning was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scale in eight studies.
“Psychological functioning was measured using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scale [124] in eight studies”
From Helping patients help themselves: A systematic review of self-management support strategies in primary health care practice (2019) · cites this paper as [97]
Cites
Treatment of Bulimia Nervosa in a Primary Care Setting
Walsh, B. T., Fairburn, C. G., Mickley, D., Sysko, R., & Parides, M. K. (2004) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.161.3.556 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hay, P., Chinn, D., Forbes, D., Madden, S., Newton, R., Sugenor, L., Touyz, S., & Ward, W. (2014) · Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/0004867414555814 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
Self-citationDineen-Griffin, S., Garcia-Cardenas, V., Williams, K., & Benrimoj, S. I. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220116 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa and binging
Hay, P. P., Bacaltchuk, J., Stefano, S., & Kashyap, P. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000562.pub3 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationGuided self-help for eating disorders: a systematic review and metaregression
Traviss‐Turner, G. D., West, R. M., & Hill, A. J. (2017) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2507 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Control interventions in randomised trials among people with mental health disorders
Faltinsen, E., Todorovac, A., Staxen Bruun, L., Hróbjartsson, A., Gluud, C., Kongerslev, M. T., Simonsen, E., & Storebø, O. J. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.mr000050.pub2 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Barakat, S., Maguire, S., Surgenor, L., Donnelly, B., Miceska, B., Fromholtz, K., Russell, J., Hay, P., & Touyz, S. (2017) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs7030039 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationThompson, D., Cachelin, F., Striegel‐Moore, R. H., Barton, B., Shea, M., & Wilson, G. T. (2012) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22009 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- BANASIAK, S. J., PAXTON, S. J., & HAY, P.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- La Trobe University (AU)
- James Cook University (AU)
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1283-1294
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2028015351
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Keywords
- bulimia nervosa, guided self-help, primary care, general practitioners, binge eating, compensatory behavior, maintenance therapy, access to psychological treatment, women
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Physicians, Family, Primary Health Care, Self Care, Time Factors, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Bulimia Nervosa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review