The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age group differences in psychological distress: the role of psychosocial risk factors that vary with age
Abstract
Background. There is continuing controversy about how age affects depression and anxiety, with a lack of consistent results across studies. Two reasons for this inconsistency are age bias in measures and different patterns of exposure to risk factors across age groups in various studies. Method. Data on anxiety and depression symptoms were collected in a community survey of 7485 persons aged 20–24, 40–44 or 60–64 years. These measures were investigated for factorial invariance across age groups. Data were also collected on a wide range of potential risk factors, including social, physical health and personal factors, with the aim of determining whether these factors might partly or wholly account for age group differences. Results. The invariance of correlated latent factors representing anxiety and depression was examined across age groups, and a generalized measure of psychological distress was computed. Depression, anxiety and psychological distress showed a decline across age groups for females and a decline from 40–44 to 60–64 years for males. Some of these age differences were accounted for by other risk factors, with the most important being recent crises at work and negative social relationships with family and friends. Conclusion. Psychological distress generally declined across the age range 20–64 years and this was not attributable to measurement bias. Differential exposure to risk factors explained some, but not all, of the age group difference. Therefore other mechanisms that explain the lower level of distress in older age groups remain to be identified.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Psychological Distress
Drapeau, A., Marchand, A., & Beaulieu-Prevost, D. (2012) · Mental Illnesses - Understanding, Prediction and Control · doi:10.5772/30872 · Cited by 472
Shahrour, G., & Dardas, L. A. (2020) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1111/jonm.13124 · Cited by 276
“1999; Jorm et al., 2005).”
Cohort Profile: The PATH through life project
Anstey, K. J., Christensen, H., Butterworth, P., Easteal, S., Mackinnon, A., Jacomb, T., Maxwell, K., Rodgers, B., Windsor, T., Cherbuin, N., et al. (2012) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dyr025 · Cited by 238
Self-citationMewton, L., Kessler, R. C., Slade, T., Hobbs, M. J., Brownhill, L., Birrell, L., Tonks, Z., Teesson, M., Newton, N., Chapman, C., et al. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000239 · Cited by 196
FAIRWEATHER, A. K., ANSTEY, K. J., RODGERS, B., & BUTTERWORTH, P. (2006) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706007823 · Cited by 90
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- JORM, A. F., WINDSOR, T. D., DEAR, K. B. G., ANSTEY, K. J., CHRISTENSEN, H., & RODGERS, B.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1253-1263
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2082251968
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age group differences in psychological distress: the role of psychosocial risk factors that vary with age. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291705004976
- The paper
- JORM, A. F., WINDSOR, T. D., DEAR, K. B. G., ANSTEY, K. J., CHRISTENSEN, H., & RODGERS, B. (2005). Age group differences in psychological distress: the role of psychosocial risk factors that vary with age. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291705004976
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.