Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder: a simulated memory impairment?
Open accessAbstract
Background. Although included in the current edition of the DSM, there does not seem to be consensus among mental health professionals regarding the diagnostic status and scientific validity of dissociative identity disorder (DID). This study was aimed at the detection of simulation of inter-identity amnesia in DID. Method. A sample of 22 DID patients was included, together with a matched control sample of subjects instructed to simulate inter-identity amnesia, a guessor group that had no knowledge of the stimulus material and a normal control group. A multiple-choice recognition test was included. The rate of incorrect answers was determined. Moreover, the specific simulation strategy used was examined by providing subjects with a range of choices that varied in extent of disagreement with the correct answer and determining whether plausible or implausible answer alternatives were selected. Results. On the recognition test DID patients selected incorrect answers above chance like simulators. Patients thus seem to use their knowledge of the correct answer in determining their given answer. They were not characterized by a well-thought-out simulating behaviour style, as indicated by the differences in selection of specific answer alternatives found between patients and simulators. Conclusions. DID patients were found not to be characterized by an actual memory retrieval inability, in contrast to their subjective reports. Instead, it is suggested that DID may more accurately be considered a disorder characterized by meta-memory problems, holding incorrect beliefs about their own memory functioning.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two studies failed to find differences in memory transfer between identity states in DID patients and control participants simulating DID-like amnesia.
“two studies failed to find differences in memory transfer between identity states in DID patients and control participants simulating DID-like amnesia, rendering interpretation of these findings unequivocal (Huntjens et al., 2006(Huntjens et al., , 2005b)).”
From A review of the relation between dissociation, memory, executive functioning and social cognition in military members and civilians with neuropsychiatric conditions (2016) · cites this paper as Huntjens et al., 2006
Cites
Kindt, M., & van den Hout, M. (2003) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(01)00135-8 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation of the evidence for the trauma and fantasy models of dissociation.
Dalenberg, C. J., Brand, B. L., Gleaves, D. H., Dorahy, M. J., Loewenstein, R. J., Cardeña, E., Frewen, P. A., Carlson, E. B., & Spiegel, D. (2012) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0027447 · Cited by 667 · see citing works
Cognitive processes in dissociation: An analysis of core theoretical assumptions.
Giesbrecht, T., Lynn, S. J., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Merckelbach, H. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.5.617 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
McKinnon, M. C., Boyd, J. E., Frewen, P. A., Lanius, U. F., Jetly, R., Richardson, J. D., & Lanius, R. A. (2016) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.017 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Inter-identity autobiographical amnesia in patients with dissociative identity disorder
Huntjens, R. J. C., Verschuere, B., & McNally, R. J. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040580 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- HUNTJENS, R. J. C., PETERS, M. L., WOERTMAN, L., BOVENSCHEN, L. M., MARTIN, R. C., & POSTMA, A.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2006-01-26
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 857-863
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2112314850
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
- Keywords
- dissociative identity disorder, memory simulation, metamemory, memory retrieval, recognition memory, diagnostic validity, DSM diagnostic criteria, dissociative disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Amnesia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Malingering, Memory Disorders, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Social Identification, Prevalence, Recognition, Psychology, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review