Cited by 50Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMemory Processes and InfluencesDeception detection and forensic psychology

Inter-identity amnesia in dissociative identity disorder: a simulated memory impairment?

Open access
HUNTJENS, RAFAËLE J. C., PETERS, MADELON L., WOERTMAN, LIESBETH, BOVENSCHEN, LOES M., MARTIN, ROY C., POSTMA, ALBERT·2006·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background. Although included in the current edition of the DSM, there does not seem to be consensus among mental health professionals regarding the diagnostic status and scientific validity of dissociative identity disorder (DID). This study was aimed at the detection of simulation of inter-identity amnesia in DID. Method. A sample of 22 DID patients was included, together with a matched control sample of subjects instructed to simulate inter-identity amnesia, a guessor group that had no knowledge of the stimulus material and a normal control group. A multiple-choice recognition test was included. The rate of incorrect answers was determined. Moreover, the specific simulation strategy used was examined by providing subjects with a range of choices that varied in extent of disagreement with the correct answer and determining whether plausible or implausible answer alternatives were selected. Results. On the recognition test DID patients selected incorrect answers above chance like simulators. Patients thus seem to use their knowledge of the correct answer in determining their given answer. They were not characterized by a well-thought-out simulating behaviour style, as indicated by the differences in selection of specific answer alternatives found between patients and simulators. Conclusions. DID patients were found not to be characterized by an actual memory retrieval inability, in contrast to their subjective reports. Instead, it is suggested that DID may more accurately be considered a disorder characterized by meta-memory problems, holding incorrect beliefs about their own memory functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291706007100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HUNTJENS, R. J. C., PETERS, M. L., WOERTMAN, L., BOVENSCHEN, L. M., MARTIN, R. C., & POSTMA, A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2006-01-26
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
857-863
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2112314850
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
dissociative identity disorder, memory simulation, metamemory, memory retrieval, recognition memory, diagnostic validity, DSM diagnostic criteria, dissociative disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Amnesia, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Malingering, Memory Disorders, Dissociative Identity Disorder, Self Concept, Severity of Illness Index, Social Identification, Prevalence, Recognition, Psychology, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review