The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Collaborative care for depression in UK primary care: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Background: Collaborative care is an effective intervention for depression which includes both organizational and patient-level intervention components. The effect in the UK is unknown, as is whether cluster- or patient-randomization would be the most appropriate design for a Phase III clinical trial. Method: We undertook a Phase II patient-level randomized controlled trial in primary care, nested within a cluster-randomized trial. Depressed participants were randomized to ‘collaborative care’ – case manager-coordinated medication support and brief psychological treatment, enhanced specialist and GP communication – or a usual care control. The primary outcome was symptoms of depression (PHQ-9). Results: We recruited 114 participants, 41 to the intervention group, 38 to the patient randomized control group and 35 to the cluster-randomized control group. For the intervention compared to the cluster control the PHQ-9 effect size was 0.63 (95% CI 0.18–1.07). There was evidence of substantial contamination between intervention and patient-randomized control participants with less difference between the intervention group and patient-randomized control group (−2.99, 95% CI −7.56 to 1.58, p=0.186) than between the intervention and cluster-randomized control group (−4.64, 95% CI −7.93 to −1.35, p=0.008). The intra-class correlation coefficient for our primary outcome was 0.06 (95% CI 0.00–0.32). Conclusions: Collaborative care is a potentially powerful organizational intervention for improving depression treatment in UK primary care, the effect of which is probably partly mediated through the organizational aspects of the intervention. A large Phase III cluster-randomized trial is required to provide the most methodologically accurate test of these initial encouraging findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The CORE-OM has published evidence of reliability and validity [29,30] and has been used in previous UK mental health trials [31].”
From Development and evaluation of culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions for under-served people in primary care (2014) · cites this paper as [31]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity
White, H. (1980) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912934 · Cited by 25,861
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I: History, Rationale, and Description
Spitzer, R. L. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005 · Cited by 4,336
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health
Campbell, M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7262.694 · Cited by 3,474 · cited 2×
“We adopted the phased approach (Campbell et al. 2000) recommended by the Medical Research Council (MRC) for investigating complex interventions (MRC, 2000).”
BackgroundMethodThe world health report 2001 - Mental health: new understanding, new hope
Sayers, J. (2001) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · doi:10.1590/s0042-96862001001100014 · Cited by 3,307
Organizing Care for Patients with Chronic Illness
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., & Korff, M. V. (1996) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3350391 · Cited by 2,877
Unützer, J., Katon, W., Callahan, C. M., Williams, Jr., Hunkeler, E., Harpole, L., Hoffing, M., Della Penna, R. D., Noël, P. H., Lin, E. H. B., et al. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.288.22.2836 · Cited by 2,405
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- none, 2000, A Framework for Development and Evaluation of RCTs for Complex Interventions to Improve Health
- Ware, 2000, How to Score Version Two of the SF-36 Health Survey
- Mann, 1998, British Journal of General Practice, 48, 875
- Singleton, 2001, Office of National Statistics: Psychiatric Morbidity Among Adults Living in Private Households
- none, 2004, Depression: Management of Depression in Primary and Secondary Care (Clinical guideline 23)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2010) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2010.03.006 · Cited by 4,057
Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems
Archer, J., Bower, P., Gilbody, S., Lovell, K., Richards, D., Gask, L., Dickens, C., & Coventry, P. (2012) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd006525.pub2 · Cited by 1,126
Self-citationWoltmann, E., Grogan-Kaylor, A., Perron, B., Georges, H., Kilbourne, A. M., & Bauer, M. S. (2012) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.11111616 · Cited by 603
Collaborative Care to Improve the Management of Depressive Disorders
Thota, A. B., Sipe, T. A., Byard, G. J., Zometa, C. S., Hahn, R. A., McKnight-Eily, L. R., Chapman, D. P., Abraído‐Lanza, A. F., Pearson, J. L., Anderson, C. W., et al. (2012) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.01.019 · Cited by 492
Depression Screening and Patient Outcomes in Cardiovascular Care: A Systematic Review
Thombs, B. D., de Jonge, P., Coyne, J. C., Whooley, M. A., Frasure-Smith, N., Mitchell, A. J., Zuidersma, M., Eze-Nliam, C., Lima, B. B., Smith, C. G., et al. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2008.667 · Cited by 472
“Dickens et al,36 2004; Great Britain HADS 17e 314 (63) 58 SCAN 65 (21) 88 (78-94) 85 (80-89) 60 (50-69) 96 (93-98)”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, D. A., Lovell, K., Gilbody, S., Gask, L., Torgerson, D., Barkham, M., Bland, M., Bower, P., Lankshear, A. J., Simpson, A., Fletcher, J., Escott, D., Hennessy, S., & Richardson, R.
- Affiliations
- University of York (GB)
- University of Manchester (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Richards, D. A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2007-09-06
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 279-287
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2097467803
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 22.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- collaborative care, depression, primary care, case managers, medication support, PHQ-9, contamination, organizational interventions
- MeSH terms
- Workforce, Adult, Mental Disorders, Cooperative Behavior, Demography, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Patient Care Team, Primary Health Care, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review