The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive behaviour therapy for improving social recovery in psychosis: a report from the ISREP MRC Trial Platform study (Improving Social Recovery in Early Psychosis)
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: This study reports on a preliminary evaluation of a cognitive behavioural intervention to improve social recovery among young people in the early stages of psychosis showing persistent signs of poor social functioning and unemployment. The study was a single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) with two arms, 35 participants receiving cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) plus treatment as usual (TAU), and 42 participants receiving TAU alone. Participants were assessed at baseline and post-treatment. METHOD: Seventy-seven participants were recruited from secondary mental health teams after presenting with a history of unemployment and poor social outcome. The cognitive behavioural intervention was delivered over a 9-month period with a mean of 12 sessions. The primary outcomes were weekly hours spent in constructive economic and structured activity. A range of secondary and tertiary outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat analysis on the combined affective and non-affective psychosis sample showed no significant impact of treatment on primary or secondary outcomes. However, analysis of interactions by diagnostic subgroup was significant for secondary symptomatic outcomes on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) [F(1, 69)=3.99, p=0.05]. Subsequent exploratory analyses within diagnostic subgroups revealed clinically important and significant improvements in weekly hours in constructive and structured activity and PANSS scores among people with non-affective psychosis. CONCLUSIONS: The primary study comparison provided no clear evidence for the benefit of CBT in a combined sample of patients. However, planned analyses with diagnostic subgroups showed important benefits for CBT among people with non-affective psychosis who have social recovery problems. These promising results need to be independently replicated in a larger, multi-centre RCT.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To date, the TUS has been variously used to measure time spent in structured activities (excluding resting and sleep) as an indicator of overall functioning (50, 52, 53); economic and structured activity participation (55); social participation (e.g. places visited and people with whom activities were completed) (56); and time use as an indicator of social recovery (54).”
From Contributions of a time use perspective in community mental health practice: a scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“The pilot study data showed signals suggesting that compared to TAU CBTsr was associated with improved economic activity (increase of 4.4 hours versus 3.2 hours) and improved structured activity (12.0 hours versus 4.1 hours).”
From A parallel group randomised open blinded evaluation of A cceptance and Commitment Therapy for d epression a fter p sychosis: Pilot t rial outcomes (ADAPT) (2017) · cites this paper as Fowler et al. (2009)
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
Cognitive Therapy of Depression
HOLLON, S. D., & BECK, A. T. (1979) · Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404480-7.50012-5 · Cited by 4,685
Jablensky, A., Sartorius, N., Ernberg, G., Anker, M., Korten, A., Cooper, J. E., Day, R., & Bertelsen, A. (1992) · Psychological Medicine. Monograph Supplement · doi:10.1017/s0264180100000904 · Cited by 1,769
The Quality of Life Scale: An Instrument for Rating the Schizophrenic Deficit Syndrome
Heinrichs, D. W., Hanlon, T. E., & Carpenter, W. T. (1984) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/10.3.388 · Cited by 1,693
Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning
Goldman, H. H., Skodol, A. E., & Lave, T. R. (1992) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148 · Cited by 1,408
Wykes, T., Steel, C., Everitt, B., & Tarrier, N. (2007) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbm114 · Cited by 1,029
American Journal of Psychiatry
Ketzenberger, K. E. (2008) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470373699.speced0109 · Cited by 858
Costing psychiatric interventions.
Beecham, J. K., & Knapp, M. R. J. (1992) · Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) · Cited by 710
Sensky, T., Turkington, D., Kingdon, D., Scott, J. L., Scott, J., Siddle, R., O'Carroll, M., & Barnes, T. R. E. (2000) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.57.2.165 · Cited by 691
Cognitive Therapy for Depression
Butler, A. C., & Beck, A. T. (1996) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e555342011-003 · Cited by 686
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Beck, 1988, Beck Hopelessness Scale Manual
- Butler, 1999, Overcoming Social Anxiety: A Self-Help Guide using Cognitive-Behavioural Techniques
- Short, 2006, Review of the UK 2000 Time Use Survey
- Beck, 1996, Manual for the Beck Depression Inventory-II
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Early intervention for psychosis
Marshall, M., & Rathbone, J. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004718.pub3 · Cited by 531
Jauhar, S., McKenna, P. J., Radua, J., Fung, E., Salvador, R., & Laws, K. R. (2014) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.116285 · Cited by 517
McGorry, P. D., Nelson, B., Goldstone, S. D., & Yung, A. R. (2010) · The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/070674371005500803 · Cited by 301
First episode psychosis and employment: A review
Rinaldi, M., Killackey, E. J., Smith, J., Shepherd, G., Singh, S. P., & Craig, T. (2010) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540261003661825 · Cited by 245
Laws, K. R., Darlington, N., Kondel, T. K., McKenna, P. J., & Jauhar, S. (2018) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-018-0243-2 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Fowler, D., Hodgekins, J., Painter, M., Reilly, T., Crane, C., Macmillan, I., Mugford, M., Croudace, T., & Jones, P. B.
- Affiliations
- University of East Anglia (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fowler, D.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2009-04-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1627-1636
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2121758476
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- figshare.com
- Licence
- Locations
- Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, early psychosis, social recovery, social functioning, unemployment, non-affective psychosis, affective psychosis, structured activities, usual care
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Social Adjustment, Social Behavior, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
