Cited by 58Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

How should DSM-V classify eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS) presentations in women with lifetime anorexia or bulimia nervosa?

Open access
Eddy, K. T., Swanson, S. A., Crosby, R. D., Franko, D. L., Engel, S., Herzog, D. B.·2010·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Anorexia nervosa (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN) are marked by longitudinal symptom fluctuations. DSM-IV-TR does not address how to classify eating disorder (ED) presentations in individuals who no longer meet full criteria for these disorders. To consider this issue, we examined subthreshold presentations in women with initial diagnoses of AN and BN. Method: A total of 246 women with AN or BN were followed for a median of 9 years; weekly symptom data were collected at frequent intervals using the Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation of Eating Disorders (LIFE-EAT-II). Outcomes were ED presentations that were subthreshold for ⩾3 months, including those narrowly missing full criteria for AN or BN, along with binge eating disorder (BED) and purging disorder. Results: During follow-up, most women (77.6%) experienced a subthreshold presentation. Subthreshold presentation was related to intake diagnosis (Wald χ 2=8.065, df=2, p=0.018). Individuals with AN most often developed subthreshold presentations resembling AN; those with BN were more likely to develop subthreshold BN. Purging disorder was experienced by half of those with BN and one-quarter of those with AN binge/purge type (ANBP); BED occurred in 20% with BN. Transition from AN or BN to most subthreshold types was associated with improved psychosocial functioning (p<0.001). Conclusions: Subthreshold presentations in women with lifetime AN and BN were common, resembled the initial diagnosis, and were associated with modest improvements in psychosocial functioning. For most with lifetime AN and BN, subthreshold presentations seem to represent part of the course of illness and to fit within the original AN or BN diagnosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291709992200

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences in the correlates and clinical profiles between discrete subtypes in this study provide evidence for the validity of these distinctions.

    “Although the frequent crossover of eating disorder subtypes in longitudinal studies of adults37–39 suggests a lack of diagnostic specificity of eating disorder subtypes,40–42 differences in the correlates and clinical profiles between discrete subtypes in our study provide evidence for the validity of these distinctions.”
  • The cross-sectional design of this study limits conclusions concerning temporal relationships among comorbid conditions and prevents confirmation of findings from adult samples concerning eating disorder crossovers or transitions from subthreshold to full-threshold conditions.

    “However, the cross-sectional design of this study limits conclusions concerning temporal relationships among comorbid conditions and prevents confirmation of findings from adult samples concerning eating disorder crossovers or transitions from subthreshold to full-threshold conditions.37–39”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eddy, K. T., Swanson, S. A., Crosby, R. D., Franko, D. L., Engel, S., & Herzog, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (US)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Eddy, K. T.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2010-01-05
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
1735-1744
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2104694109
Cited by
58
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F32MH084396, R01MH038333)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK040561)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
eating disorder not otherwise specified, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, DSM-5 classification, binge eating disorder, purging disorder, women, psychosocial functioning, clinical course
MeSH terms
Anorexia, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Markov Chains, Psychology, Social Adjustment, Chi-Square Distribution, Linear Models, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Bulimia Nervosa, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review