Cited by 162Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and AccessHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The balanced care model for global mental health

Thornicroft, G., Tansella, M.·2013·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background For too long there have been heated debates between those who believe that mental health care should be largely or solely provided from hospitals and those who adhere to the view that community care should fully replace hospitals. The aim of this study was to propose a conceptual model relevant for mental health service development in low-, medium- and high-resource settings worldwide. Method We conducted a review of the relevant peer-reviewed evidence and a series of surveys including more than 170 individual experts with direct experience of mental health system change worldwide. We integrated data from these multiple sources to develop the balanced care model (BCM), framed in three sequential steps relevant to different resource settings. Results Low-resource settings need to focus on improving the recognition and treatment of people with mental illnesses in primary care. Medium-resource settings in addition can develop 'general adult mental health services', namely (i) out-patient clinics, (ii) community mental health teams (CMHTs), (iii) acute in-patient services, (iv) community residential care and (v) work/occupation. High-resource settings, in addition to primary care and general adult mental health services, can also provide specialized services in these same five categories. Conclusions The BCM refers both to a balance between hospital and community care and to a balance between all of the service components (e.g. clinical teams) that are present in any s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291712001420

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 211 · Cited by 162

Authors
Thornicroft, G., & Tansella, M.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Thornicroft, G.
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2012-07-11
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
849-863
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2081967089
Cited by
162
References
211
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • World Bank Group
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10053)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
global mental health, mental health service development, community mental health teams, primary care mental health, community residential care, mental health professionals
MeSH terms
Workforce, Ambulatory Care, Mental Disorders, Data Collection, Delivery of Health Care, Health Planning, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Services Research, Hospitalization, Humans, Mental Health Services, Models, Theoretical, Poverty, Socioeconomic Factors, Global Health, Consensus, Healthcare Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review