Cited by 82Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingBipolar Disorder and Treatment

Prediction of psychosis in prodrome: development and validation of a simple, personalized risk calculator

Zhang, TianHong, Xu, LiHua, Tang, YingYing, Li, HuiJun, Tang, XiaoChen, Cui, HuiRu, Wei, YanYan, Wang, Yan +8 more·2019·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background: This study aim to derive and validate a simple and well-performing risk calculator (RC) for predicting psychosis in individual patients at clinical high risk (CHR). Methods: From the ongoing ShangHai-At-Risk-for-Psychosis (SHARP) program, 417 CHR cases were identified based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Symptoms (SIPS), of whom 349 had at least 1-year follow-up assessment. Of these 349 cases, 83 converted to psychosis. Logistic regression was used to build a multivariate model to predict conversion. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to test the effectiveness of the SIPS-RC. Second, an independent sample of 100 CHR subjects was recruited based on an identical baseline and follow-up procedures to validate the performance of the SIPS-RC. Results: Four predictors (each based on a subset of SIPS-based items) were used to construct the SIPS-RC: (1) functional decline; (2) positive symptoms (unusual thoughts, suspiciousness); (3) negative symptoms (social anhedonia, expression of emotion, ideational richness); and (4) general symptoms (dysphoric mood). The SIPS-RC showed moderate discrimination of subsequent transition to psychosis with an AUC of 0.744 (p < 0.001). A risk estimate of 25% or higher had around 75% accuracy for predicting psychosis. The personalized risk generated by the SIPS-RC provided a solid estimate of conversion outcomes in the independent validation sample, with an AUC of 0.804 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.662–0.951]. Conclusion: The SIPS-RC, which is simple and easy to use, can perform in the same manner as the NAPLS-2 RC in the Chinese clinical population. Such a tool may be used by clinicians to counsel appropriately their patients about clinical monitor v. potential treatment options.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033291718002738

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, T., Xu, L., Tang, Y., Li, H., Tang, X., Cui, H., Wei, Y., Wang, Y., Hu, Q., Liu, X., Li, C., Lu, Z., McCarley, R. W., Seidman, L. J., Wang, J., & on behalf of the SHARP (ShangHai At Risk for Psychosis) Study Group
Affiliations
  • Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
  • Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University (US)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lu, Zheng
  • Wang, JiJun
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2018-09-14
Volume
49
Issue
12
Pages
1990-1998
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2890862698
Cited by
82
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH093294)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Keywords
prodromal psychosis, clinical high risk for psychosis, risk calculator, functional decline, positive symptoms, negative symptoms, dysphoric mood
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, China, Female, Humans, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Reproducibility of Results, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment, Area Under Curve, Young Adult, Prodromal Symptoms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review