Cited by 34Child Abuse and TraumaChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Welfare and Adoption

Adverse childhood experiences and adult mood problems: evidence from a five-decade prospective birth cohort

Open access
Selous, Camilla, Kelly-Irving, Michelle, Maughan, Barbara, Eyre, Olga, Rice, Frances, Collishaw, Stephan·2020·Psychological Medicine

Abstract

Background Retrospectively recalled adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) are associated with adult mood problems, but evidence from prospective population cohorts is limited. The aims of this study were to test links between prospectively ascertained ACEs and adult mood problems up to age 50, to examine the role of child mental health in accounting for observed associations, and to test gender differences in associations. Methods The National Child Development Study is a UK population cohort of children born in 1958. ACEs were defined using parent or teacher reports of family adversity (parental separation, child taken into care, parental neglect, family mental health service use, alcoholism and criminality) at ages 7-16. Children with no known (n = 9168), single (n = 2488) and multiple (n = 897) ACEs were identified in childhood. Adult mood problems were assessed using the Malaise inventory at ages 23, 33, 42 and 50 years. Associations were examined separately for males and females. Results Experiencing single or multiple ACEs was associated with increased rates of adult mood problems after adjustment for childhood psychopathology and confounders at birth [2+ v. 0 ACEs - men: age 23: odds ratio (OR) 2.36 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-3.3); age 33: OR 2.40 (1.7-3.4); age 42: OR 1.85 (1.4-2.4); age 50: OR 2.63 (2.0-3.5); women: age 23: OR 2.00 (95% CI 1.5-2.6); age 33: OR 1.81 (1.3-2.5); age 42: OR 1.59 (1.2-2.1); age 50: OR 1.32 (1.0-1.7)]. Conclusions Children exposed to…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s003329171900271x

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Selous, C., Kelly-Irving, M., Maughan, B., Eyre, O., Rice, F., & Collishaw, S.
Affiliations
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Collishaw, Stephan
Venue
Psychological Medicine
Published
2019-10-04
Volume
50
Issue
14
Pages
2444-2451
ISSN
  • 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8978
OpenAlex
W2977302256
Cited by
34
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Psychological Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/L010305/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
adverse childhood experiences, depression, National Child Development Study, child mental health, parental separation, parental neglect, family adversity, gender differences, early prevention
MeSH terms
Adult Survivors of Child Adverse Events, Adverse Childhood Experiences, Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Child, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Logistic Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review