The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
BRIEF COMMUNICATION.: Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands
Open accessAbstract
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) has been widely used in studies of late-life depression. Psychometric properties are generally favourable, but data on the criterion validity of the CES-D in elderly community-based samples are lacking. In a sample of older (55–85 years) inhabitants of the Netherlands, 487 subjects were selected to study criterion validity of the CES-D. Using the 1-month prevalence of major depression derived from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule (DIS) as criterion, the weighted sensitivity of the CES-D was 100%; specificity 88%; and positive predictive value 13·2%. False positives were not more likely among elderly with physical illness, cognitive decline or anxiety. We conclude that the criterion validity of the CES-D for major depression was very satisfactory in this sample of older adults.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Detecting anxiety and depression in general medical settings.
Goldberg, D., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P., & Grayson, D. (1988) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897 · Cited by 1,210
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (2013) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t03589-000 · Cited by 946
Cited by
Salk, R. H., Hyde, J. S., & Abramson, L. Y. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000102 · Cited by 2,622
“Numerous validation studies are available; in one, the CES-D had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 88% for 1-month major depression diagnoses (Beekman et al., 1997).”
Early television exposure and subsequent attentional problems in children
Christakis, D. A., Zimmerman, F. J., DiGiuseppe, D. L., & McCarty, C. A. (2004) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.113.4.708 · Cited by 926
Psychometric qualities of a brief self-rated fatigue measure
Michielsen, H. J., De Vries, J., & Van Heck, G. L. (2003) · Journal of Psychosomatic Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(02)00392-6 · Cited by 860
Wulsin, L. R., & Singal, B. M. (2003) · Psychosomatic Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000058371.50240.e3 · Cited by 730
Intimate Partner Violence and Women’s Physical, Mental, and Social Functioning
Bonomi, A. E., Thompson, R. S., Anderson, M., Reid, R. J., Carrell, D., Dimer, J. A., & Rivara, F. P. (2006) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2006.01.015 · Cited by 686
Metadata
- Authors
- BEEKMAN, A. T. F., DEEG, D. J. H., VAN LIMBEEK, J., BRAAM, A. W., DE VRIES, M. Z., & VAN TILBURG, W.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-235
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2098307144
- Cited by
- 1,115
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRIEF COMMUNICATION.: Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291796003510
- The paper
- BEEKMAN, A. T. F., DEEG, D. J. H., VAN LIMBEEK, J., BRAAM, A. W., DE VRIES, M. Z., & VAN TILBURG, W. (1997). BRIEF COMMUNICATION.: Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D): results from a community-based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291796003510
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
