The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder
Abstract
Background. In post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) there is a need for self-rating scales that are sensitive to treatment effects and have been tested in a broad range of trauma survivors. Separate measures of frequency and severity may also provide an advantage. Methods. Three hundred and fifty-three men and women completed the Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS), a 17-item scale measuring each DSM-IV symptom of PTSD on 5-point frequency and severity scales. These subjects comprised war veterans, survivors of rape or hurricane and a mixed trauma group participating in a clinical trial. Other scales were included as validity checks as follows: Global ratings, SCL-90-R, Eysenck Scale, Impact of Event Scale and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R. Results. The scale demonstrated good test–retest reliability (r = 0·86), internal consistency (r = 0·99). One main factor emerged for severity and a smaller one for intrusion. In PTSD diagnosed subjects, and the factor structure more closely resembled the traditional grouping of symptoms. Concurrent validity was obtained against the SCID, with a diagnostic accuracy of 83% at a DTS score of 40. Good convergent and divergent validity was obtained. The DTS showed predictive validity against response to treatment, as well as being sensitive to treatment effects. Conclusions. The DTS showed good reliability and validity, and offers promised as a scale which is particularly suited to assessing symptom severity, treatment outcome and in screening for the likely diagnosis of PTSD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
The assessment of anxiety states by rating
HAMILTON, M. (1959) · British Journal of Medical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8341.1959.tb00467.x · Cited by 11,455
Cited by
Psychometric properties of the PTSD checklist—civilian version
Ruggiero, K. J., Ben, K. D., Scotti, J. R., & Rabalais, A. E. (2003) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1023/a:1025714729117 · Cited by 1,227
Brief screening instrument for post-traumatic stress disorder
Brewin, C. R., Rose, S., Andrews, B., Green, J., Tata, P., McEvedy, C., Turner, S., & Foa, E. B. (2002) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.181.2.158 · Cited by 623
Disturbed sleep in post-traumatic stress disorder: secondary symptom or core feature?
Spoormaker, V. I., & Montgomery, P. (2008) · Sleep Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.smrv.2007.08.008 · Cited by 527
Pharmacotherapy for post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)
Stein, D. J., Ipser, J. C., Seedat, S., Sager, C., & Amos, T. (2006) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002795.pub2 · Cited by 519
Cuthbertson, B. H., Rattray, J., Campbell, M. K., Gager, M., Roughton, S., Smith, A., Hull, A., Breeman, S., Norrie, J., Jenkinson, D., et al. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b3723 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- DAVIDSON, J. R. T., BOOK, S. W., COLKET, J. T., TUPLER, L. A., ROTH, S., DAVID, D., HERTZBERG, M., MELLMAN, T., BECKHAM, J. C., SMITH, R. D., DAVISON, R. M., KATZ, R., & FELDMAN, M. E.
- Venue
- Psychological Medicine
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-160
- ISSN
- 0033-2917 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8978
- OpenAlex
- W2027845679
- Cited by
- 977
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 17.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033291796004229
- The paper
- DAVIDSON, J. R. T., BOOK, S. W., COLKET, J. T., TUPLER, L. A., ROTH, S., DAVID, D., HERTZBERG, M., MELLMAN, T., BECKHAM, J. C., SMITH, R. D., DAVISON, R. M., KATZ, R., & FELDMAN, M. E. (1997). Assessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychological Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291796004229
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.