The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The potential and limitations of neutrons, electrons and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained biological molecules
Abstract
Summary: Radiation damage is the main problem which prevents the determination of the structure of a single biological macromolecule at atomic resolution using any kind of microscopy. This is true whether neutrons, electrons or X-rays are used as the illumination. For neutrons, the cross-section for nuclear capture and the associatedenergy deposition and radiation damage could be reduced by using samples that are fully deuterated and 15 N-labelled and by using fast neutrons, but single molecule biological microscopy is still not feasible. For naturally occurring biological material,electrons at present provide the most information for a given amount of radiation damage. Using phase contrast electron microscopy on biological molecules and macromolecular assemblies of ˜ 10 5 molecular weight and above, there is in theory enough information present in the image to allow determination of the position and orientation of individual particles: the application of averaging methods can then be used to provide an atomic resolution structure. The images of approximately 10000 particles are required. Below 10 5 molecular weight, some kind of crystal or other geometrically ordered aggregate is necessary to provide a sufficiently high combined molecular weight to allow for the alignment. In practice, the present quality of the best images still falls short of that attainable in theory and this means that a greater number of particles must be averaged and that the molecular weight limitation is somewhat larger than the predicted limit. For X-rays, the amount of damage per useful elastic scattering event is several hundred times greater than for electrons at all wavelengths and energies and therefore the requirements on specimen size and number of particles are correspondingly larger. Because of the lack of sufficiently bright neutron sources in the foreseeable future, electron microscopy in practice provides the greatest potential for immediate progress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rosenthal, P. B., & Henderson, R. (2003) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2003.07.013 · Cited by 2,416
Self-citationPotential for biomolecular imaging with femtosecond X-ray pulses
Neutze, R., Wouts, R., van der Spoel, D., Weckert, E., & Hajdu, J. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021099 · Cited by 2,022
Femtosecond electronic response of atoms to ultra-intense X-rays
Young, L., Kanter, E. P., Krässig, B., Li, Y., March, A. M., Pratt, S. T., Santra, R., Southworth, S. H., Rohringer, N., DiMauro, L. F., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09177 · Cited by 792
Cryo-electron microscopy--a primer for the non-microscopist
Milne, J. L. S., Borgnia, M. J., Bartesaghi, A., Tran, E. E. H., Earl, L. A., Schauder, D. M., Lengyel, J., Pierson, J., Patwardhan, A., & Subramaniam, S. (2013) · The FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.12078 · Cited by 277
Electron crystallography of ultrathin 3D protein crystals: atomic model with charges
Yonekura, K., Kato, K., Ogasawara, M., Tomita, M., & Toyoshima, C. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1500724112 · Cited by 190
Multiwavelength Anomalous Diffraction at High X-Ray Intensity
Son, S.-K., Chapman, H. N., & Santra, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.218102 · Cited by 120
Yoon, C. H., Yurkov, M. V., Schneidmiller, E. A., Samoylova, L., Buzmakov, A., Jurek, Z., Ziaja, B., Santra, R., Loh, N. D., Tschentscher, T., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep24791 · Cited by 51
Castells-Graells, R., Meador, K., Arbing, M. A., Sawaya, M. R., Gee, M., Cascio, D., Gleave, E., Debreczeni, J. É., Breed, J., Leopold, K., et al. (2023) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2305494120 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Henderson, R.
- Venue
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-193
- ISSN
- 0033-5835 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8994
- OpenAlex
- W2149705812
- Cited by
- 1,194
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.