The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Chaos in biological systems
Abstract
Chaos is a widespread and easily recognizable phenomenon that hardly anybody took notice of until recently. The reason may be that chaos has something profoundly counterintuitive about it. It will not fit easily into any familiar cause–effect frame. The best introduction to chaos is by the way of an example. Consider a leaking faucet (Shaw, 1984). When the weight of the accumulating drop exceeds the surface tension the drop falls and a new drop begins to form. If the leak is small and the pressure in the faucet is constant, the time taken for the drop to reach the critical weight is constant. The dripping is perfectly periodic, the period depending on the leak rate. If the leak is slightly increased, the period of dripping will decrease slightly and vice versa. However, somewhere beyond this point the leaking faucet becomes a nuisance. When the leak is increased beyond a certain point the dripping looses its regularity. The time interval between the drops will first alternate periodically between a short and a long time interval. After a further increase of the leak this double periodic pattern will become unstable and change into a new pattern where four different time intervals between the drops alternate periodically. As the leak is further increased the period will double again and again and finally the dripping becomes completely irregular without any repeating pattern. When this occurs we are observing chaos. At the same time we are posed with the problem of understanding how such a ridiculously simple system can show random behaviour.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detecting strange attractors in turbulence
Takens, F. (1981) · Lecture Notes in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bfb0091924 · Cited by 10,459
Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics
May, R. M. (1976) · Nature · doi:10.1038/261459a0 · Cited by 7,001
Cited by
Multiple early factors anticipate post-acute COVID-19 sequelae
Su, Y., Yuan, D., Chen, D. G., Ng, R. H., Wang, K., Choi, J., Li, S., Hong, S., Zhang, R., Xie, J., et al. (2022) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.01.014 · Cited by 1,156
A simple guide to chaos and complexity
Rickles, D., Hawe, P., & Shiell, A. (2007) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.2006.054254 · Cited by 438
Epileptic seizure prediction and control
Iasemidis, L. D. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.810705 · Cited by 363
Four-dimensional autonomous dynamical systems with conservative flows: two-case study
Cang, S., Wu, A., Wang, Z., & Chen, Z. (2017) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-017-3599-6 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Olsen, L. F., & Degn, H.
- Venue
- Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 1985-05
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 165-225
- ISSN
- 0033-5835 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8994
- OpenAlex
- W1985122168
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chaos in biological systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1017/s0033583500005175
- The paper
- Olsen, L. F., & Degn, H. (1985). Chaos in biological systems. Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033583500005175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.